Suppr超能文献

双相躁狂症患者与单相抑郁症患者功能失调认知的内容特异性:一项初步研究。

Content-specificity of dysfunctional cognitions for patients with bipolar mania versus unipolar depression: a preliminary study.

作者信息

Goldberg Joseph F, Wenze Susan J, Welker Tara M, Steer Robert A, Beck Aaron T

机构信息

Bipolar Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2005 Feb;7(1):49-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00165.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dysfunctional beliefs or cognitions are considered to be fundamental to both the phenomenology and pathogenesis of depression. However, the cognitive aspects of mania have not been as thoroughly investigated. We sought to compare the maladaptive beliefs and cognitions of 23 bipolar manic or hypomanic patients, 28 patients with unipolar major depression, and 24 normal adults.

METHOD

The Cognition Checklist for Mania (CCL-M) was used to assess the beliefs. This 61-item self-report instrument is scored for seven subscales measuring (a) self-importance, (b) interpersonal grandiosity, (c) inappropriate spending, (d) excitement and risk-taking, (e) interpersonal frustrations, (f) goal-driven activity, and (g) past or future outlooks on life, and also yields a total score.

RESULTS

The mean CCL-M total score of the bipolar-manic patients was significantly higher than the mean CCL-M total score of the unipolar-depressed patients, and the patients' mean CCL-M total score was also higher than that of the normal adults. The mean scores of the subscales measuring excitement and past and future memories and expectations were also significantly higher for the bipolar-manic than unipolar-depressed patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar-manic patients endorse with maladaptive beliefs and cognitions that are associated with mania more than do unipolar-depressed patients and normal adults. The implications for the early identification of cognitions associated with prodromal states of mania, and for psychotherapeutic interventions, are discussed.

摘要

目的

功能失调的信念或认知被认为是抑郁症现象学和发病机制的基础。然而,躁狂症的认知方面尚未得到充分研究。我们试图比较23名双相躁狂或轻躁狂患者、28名单相重度抑郁症患者和24名正常成年人的适应不良信念和认知。

方法

使用躁狂症认知清单(CCL-M)来评估信念。这个61项的自我报告工具根据七个分量表进行评分,测量(a)自我重要性,(b)人际夸大,(c)不当消费,(d)兴奋和冒险,(e)人际挫折,(f)目标驱动活动,以及(g)过去或未来的生活展望,并且还得出一个总分。

结果

双相躁狂患者的CCL-M总分均值显著高于单相抑郁患者的CCL-M总分均值,并且患者的CCL-M总分均值也高于正常成年人。双相躁狂患者在测量兴奋以及过去和未来记忆与期望的分量表上的平均分也显著高于单相抑郁患者。

结论

双相躁狂患者比单相抑郁患者和正常成年人更认同与躁狂症相关的适应不良信念和认知。讨论了其对早期识别与躁狂症前驱状态相关的认知以及心理治疗干预的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验