• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次头孢克肟与每日两次甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗婴幼儿尿路感染的比较。

Once daily cefixime compared with twice daily trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infection in infants and children.

作者信息

Dagan R, Einhorn M, Lang R, Pomeranz A, Wolach B, Miron D, Raz R, Weinstock A, Steinberger J

机构信息

Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Mar;11(3):198-203. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199203000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00006454-199203000-00005
PMID:1565534
Abstract

We conducted a randomized prospective multicenter study to compare the safety and efficacy of once daily oral cefixime (8 mg/kg) to twice daily oral trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) (8/40 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of acute urinary tract infection in children ages 6 months to 13 years. Seventy-six patients (38 in each group) were studied. Thirty-seven percent were younger than 3 years of age. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate in both groups (85%). Eighty-five percent of all Gram-negative organisms were susceptible to TMP/SMX and all were susceptible to cefixime. Seventy-two percent of all patients were febrile at the time of diagnosis. Both groups were treated for 7 to 10 days. Peripheral white blood cell counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, body temperature and urinalysis returned to normal at the same rate in both groups. No failures were observed and relapse occurred in 3 cases within the 4 weeks after treatment (2 in the cefixime group and one in the TMP/SMX group). Side effects were observed in 14% of the cefixime group and 16% of the TMP/SMX group and were all mild enough not to necessitate discontinuation of therapy. We conclude that the efficacy and safety of cefixime administered once daily compared favorably with TMP/SMX administered twice daily for acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection.

摘要

我们进行了一项随机前瞻性多中心研究,以比较每日一次口服头孢克肟(8毫克/千克)与每日两次口服甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑(TMP/SMX)(8/40毫克/千克/天)治疗6个月至13岁儿童急性尿路感染的安全性和有效性。研究了76例患者(每组38例)。37%的患者年龄小于3岁。大肠杆菌是两组中最常见的分离菌株(85%)。所有革兰氏阴性菌中,85%对TMP/SMX敏感,所有菌株对头孢克肟均敏感。所有患者中,85%在诊断时发热。两组均治疗7至10天。两组外周血白细胞计数、红细胞沉降率、体温和尿液分析恢复正常的速度相同。未观察到治疗失败,治疗后4周内有3例复发(头孢克肟组2例,TMP/SMX组1例)。头孢克肟组14%的患者和TMP/SMX组16%的患者出现副作用,且均轻微,无需停药。我们得出结论,对于急性单纯性尿路感染,每日一次服用头孢克肟的疗效和安全性优于每日两次服用TMP/SMX。

相似文献

1
Once daily cefixime compared with twice daily trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of urinary tract infection in infants and children.每日一次头孢克肟与每日两次甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗婴幼儿尿路感染的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Mar;11(3):198-203. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199203000-00005.
2
Cefixime versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in treatment of patients with acute, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections.头孢克肟与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗急性单纯性下尿路感染患者的疗效比较
Urology. 1989 Nov;34(5):322-6. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(89)90335-x.
3
A randomized, double-blind study comparing cefixime and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of childhood shigellosis.一项比较头孢克肟和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗儿童志贺菌病的随机双盲研究。
J Pediatr. 1993 Nov;123(5):817-21. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80867-4.
4
Efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin oral suspension versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole oral suspension for treatment of older women with acute urinary tract infection.环丙沙星口服混悬液与复方磺胺甲恶唑口服混悬液治疗老年女性急性尿路感染的疗效及安全性比较
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Dec;49(12):1606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.t01-1-49268.x.
5
Uncomplicated urinary tract infections: lomefloxacin versus trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole.单纯性尿路感染:洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑的比较
J Int Med Res. 1992 Nov;20(6):467-74. doi: 10.1177/030006059202000604.
6
Randomized clinical trial of rifampin-trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim in the treatment of localized urinary tract infections.利福平-甲氧苄啶与磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶治疗局限性尿路感染的随机临床试验。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Jun;32(6):802-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.6.802.
7
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: results from a multicenter study.洛美沙星与甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗单纯性尿路感染的安全性和有效性比较:一项多中心研究的结果
Am J Med. 1992 Apr 6;92(4A):71S-74S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90313-z.
8
Comparison of cefixime and co-trimoxazole in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection. A double-blind general practice study.头孢克肟与复方新诺明治疗急性单纯性尿路感染的比较。一项双盲全科医学研究。
S Afr Med J. 1986 Oct 11;70(8):455-60.
9
A randomized trial of short-course ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of acute urinary tract infection in women. Ciprofloxacin Urinary Tract Infection Group.一项关于短程环丙沙星、氧氟沙星或甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑治疗女性急性尿路感染的随机试验。环丙沙星尿路感染组。
Am J Med. 1999 Mar;106(3):292-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00026-1.
10
Prophylaxis of urinary tract infection in persons with recent spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.近期脊髓损伤患者尿路感染的预防:一项关于甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
Am J Med. 1993 Aug;95(2):141-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90254-m.

引用本文的文献

1
A Validated RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Cefixime and Clavulanic Acid Powder in Pediatric Oral Suspension.一种用于同时测定小儿口服混悬液中头孢克肟和克拉维酸粉的经过验证的反相高效液相色谱法。
Int J Anal Chem. 2022 Jul 1;2022:8331762. doi: 10.1155/2022/8331762. eCollection 2022.
2
Antibiotics and Cure Rates in Childhood Febrile Urinary Tract Infections in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.抗生素在临床试验中对儿童发热性尿路感染的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drugs. 2018 Oct;78(15):1593-1604. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0988-1.
3
Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children.
儿童急性肾盂肾炎的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 28;2014(7):CD003772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003772.pub4.
4
Antibiotics for treating lower urinary tract infection in children.用于治疗儿童下尿路感染的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD006857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006857.pub2.
5
Cefixime use in children: When and why.儿童使用头孢克肟:时机与原因。
Can J Infect Dis. 1995 Jul;6(4):204-5. doi: 10.1155/1995/170243.
6
A survey of the management of urinary tract infection in children in primary care and comparison with the NICE guidelines.基层医疗中儿童泌尿道感染管理的调查及与 NICE 指南的比较。
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jan 26;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-6.