McCormack Teresa, Hoerl Christoph
Department of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, David Keir Building, Malone Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 5BP, UK.
Dev Psychol. 2005 Jan;41(1):54-63. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.1.54.
Four experiments examined children's ability to reason about the causal significance of the order in which 2 events occurred (the pressing of buttons on a mechanically operated box). In Study 1, 4-year-olds were unable to make the relevant inferences, whereas 5-year-olds were successful on one version of the task. In Study 2, 3-year-olds were successful on a simplified version of the task in which they were able to observe the events although not their consequences. Study 3 found that older children had difficulties with the original task even when provided with cues to attend to order information. However, 5-year-olds performed successfully in Study 4, in which the causally relevant event was made more salient.
四项实验研究了儿童对两个事件发生顺序(在一个机械操作盒上按按钮)的因果重要性进行推理的能力。在研究1中,4岁儿童无法做出相关推断,而5岁儿童在该任务的一个版本中取得了成功。在研究2中,3岁儿童在简化版任务中取得了成功,在这个版本中他们能够观察到事件,尽管看不到事件的后果。研究3发现,即使给年龄较大的儿童提供关注顺序信息的线索,他们在原始任务中仍有困难。然而,5岁儿童在研究4中表现成功,在该研究中因果相关事件更加显著。