• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类规划能让我们了解动物规划的哪些方面:一个实证案例。

What Human Planning Can Tell Us About Animal Planning: An Empirical Case.

作者信息

Martin-Ordas Gema

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00635. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00635
PMID:32308638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7145970/
Abstract

The ability to think about and plan for the future is a critical cognitive skill for our daily life. There is ongoing debate about whether other animals possess future thinking. Part of the difficulty in resolving this debate is that there is not a definite methodology that allow us to conclude that animals (and human children) are truly thinking about a future event. Research with humans-both children and adults- will benefit the field of comparative psychology by providing information about the range of humans' responses when they are faced with problems similar to those presented to other animals. Inspired by a problem that chimpanzees experienced in the wild, children of 4 and 5 years of age and young adults were presented with a situation in which they were expected to select two tools in order to obtain a reward. More older children than 4 years old successfully obtained the reward. Adults also succeeded at solving the problem. However, both children and adults struggled to select the two correct tools any tool-use action was executed. While children's performance is discussed in the context of temporal components required to envisage future events, adults' performance is interpreted in the context of cognitive effort. These findings link developmental and adult cognition with comparative psychology.

摘要

思考未来并为未来做规划的能力是我们日常生活中一项至关重要的认知技能。关于其他动物是否具备未来思维,目前仍在争论之中。解决这一争论的部分困难在于,没有一种明确的方法能让我们断定动物(以及人类儿童)真的在思考未来事件。对人类(包括儿童和成年人)的研究,通过提供有关人类在面对与其他动物所面临问题相似的情况时的反应范围的信息,将有助于比较心理学领域。受黑猩猩在野外遇到的一个问题启发,4岁和5岁的儿童以及年轻人被置于一种情境中,要求他们选择两种工具以获得奖励。4岁以上的大龄儿童比4岁儿童更成功地获得了奖励。成年人也成功解决了这个问题。然而,在执行任何工具使用行动之前,儿童和成年人都难以选择正确的两种工具。虽然儿童的表现是在设想未来事件所需的时间成分的背景下进行讨论的,但成年人的表现是在认知努力的背景下进行解释的。这些发现将发展认知和成人认知与比较心理学联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/6320cd6fe6ee/fpsyg-11-00635-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/99c809b46cf4/fpsyg-11-00635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/18b8a2bfd33c/fpsyg-11-00635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/b1ac4a6751c6/fpsyg-11-00635-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/6320cd6fe6ee/fpsyg-11-00635-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/99c809b46cf4/fpsyg-11-00635-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/18b8a2bfd33c/fpsyg-11-00635-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/b1ac4a6751c6/fpsyg-11-00635-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22d2/7145970/6320cd6fe6ee/fpsyg-11-00635-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
What Human Planning Can Tell Us About Animal Planning: An Empirical Case.人类规划能让我们了解动物规划的哪些方面:一个实证案例。
Front Psychol. 2020 Apr 3;11:635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00635. eCollection 2020.
2
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Across the great divide: bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking.跨越巨大差异:弥合对幼儿与大龄儿童思维理解之间的差距
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2000;65(2):i-vii, 1-96.
5
Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition.思维的时间与关于时间:时间认知的双重系统观点。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 25;42:e244. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002157.
6
The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.婴儿期朴素心理学的发展起源。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2009;37:55-104. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(09)03702-1.
7
The Development of Size Sequencing Skills: An Empirical and Computational Analysis.大小排序技能的发展:一项实证和计算分析。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Dec;84(4):7-202. doi: 10.1111/mono.12411.
8
Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?丰富化对成人认知发展的影响:老年人的功能能力能否得到保持和增强?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
9
Children as Investigators of Brunerian "Possible Worlds". The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children's Argumentative Thinking.作为布鲁纳式“可能世界”探索者的儿童。叙事场景在儿童论证性思维中的作用。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2019 Dec;53(4):679-693. doi: 10.1007/s12124-019-09505-3.
10
Development of planning in 4- to 10-year-old children: reducing inhibitory demands does not improve performance.4 至 10 岁儿童计划性发展:减少抑制性需求并不能提高表现。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Sep;125:85-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Planning abilities of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) in tool-using contexts.野生黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes troglodytes)在使用工具时的规划能力。
Primates. 2024 Nov;65(6):525-539. doi: 10.1007/s10329-023-01106-4. Epub 2023 Dec 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Thinking about the future: Comparing children's forced-choice versus "generative" responses in the "spoon test".思考未来:在“勺子测试”中比较儿童的强制性选择与“生成性”反应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.006.
2
Thinking in and about time: A dual systems perspective on temporal cognition.思维的时间与关于时间:时间认知的双重系统观点。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Sep 25;42:e244. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18002157.
3
The Role of Association in Pre-schoolers' Solutions to "Spoon Tests" of Future Planning.
协会在学龄前儿童解决“未来规划勺测试”中的作用。
Curr Biol. 2018 Jul 23;28(14):2309-2313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.052. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
4
Future planning in preschool children.学前儿童的未来规划。
Dev Psychol. 2018 May;54(5):866-874. doi: 10.1037/dev0000484. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Ravens parallel great apes in flexible planning for tool-use and bartering.渡鸦在灵活规划工具使用和物物交换方面与类人猿相似。
Science. 2017 Jul 14;357(6347):202-204. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8138. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
Smoking in Movies and Adolescent Smoking Initiation: A Longitudinal Study among Argentinian Adolescents.电影中的吸烟镜头与青少年吸烟行为的起始:一项针对阿根廷青少年的纵向研究。
J Pediatr. 2017 Jan;180:222-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
7
Children's predictions of future perceptual experiences: Temporal reasoning and phenomenology.儿童对未来感知体验的预测:时间推理与现象学。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Nov;52(11):1820-1831. doi: 10.1037/dev0000197.
8
Sex differences in young children's use of tools in a problem-solving task : The role of object-oriented play.幼儿在解决问题任务中使用工具的性别差异:以物为导向游戏的作用。
Hum Nat. 2005 Jun;16(2):211-32. doi: 10.1007/s12110-005-1004-5.
9
Episodic memory and future thinking during early childhood: Linking the past and future.幼儿期的情景记忆与前瞻性思维:连接过去与未来。
Dev Psychobiol. 2015 Jul;57(5):552-65. doi: 10.1002/dev.21307. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
10
Thinking ahead about where something is needed: new insights about episodic foresight in preschoolers.提前思考所需事物的位置:关于学龄前儿童情景预见的新见解。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;129:98-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 3.