Dralle Henning, Sekulla Carsten, Haerting Johannes, Timmermann Wolfgang, Neumann Hans Jürgen, Kruse Eberhard, Grond Stefan, Mühlig Hans Peter, Richter Christian, Voss Johannes, Thomusch Oliver, Lippert Hans, Gastinger Ingo, Brauckhoff Michael, Gimm Oliver
Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Klinikum Kröllwitz, University of Halle, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, D-06097 Halle, Germany.
Surgery. 2004 Dec;136(6):1310-22. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2004.07.018.
Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring (RLNM) has been suspected to reduce postoperative RLN paralysis (RLNP). However, functional outcome of RLNM in comparison with no nerve identification and visual nerve identification only has not been analyzed.
Analysis of 16,448 consecutive multi-institutional operations resulted in 29,998 nerves at risk. Three groups of different RLN treatment were compared: group 1, no RLN identification; group 2, visual RLN identification; and group 3, visual RLN identification and electromyographic monitoring. RLNM was performed with a bipolar needle electrode that was placed through the cricothyroid ligament into the vocal muscle.
Risk factors for permanent RLNP were recurrent benign and malignant goiter (odds ratios, [ORs]), 4.7, and 6.7, respectively), primary surgery in thyroid malignancy (OR, 2.0), lobectomy (OR, 1.8), no nerve identification (OR, 1.4), low or medium volume hospital (OR, 1.3), and low volume surgeons (OR, 1.2).
Based on these data, visual nerve identification was identified to be the gold standard of RLN treatment in thyroid surgery. RLNM is a promising tool for nerve identification and protection in extended thyroid resection procedures. However, because of the overall low frequency of RLNP, no statistical difference compared with visual nerve identification only was reached in the setting of this study.
喉返神经监测(RLNM)被认为可降低术后喉返神经麻痹(RLNP)的发生率。然而,与未进行神经识别及仅进行视觉神经识别相比,喉返神经监测的功能结局尚未得到分析。
对16448例连续的多机构手术进行分析,共涉及29998条有风险的神经。比较了三组不同的喉返神经处理方式:第1组,未进行喉返神经识别;第2组,视觉识别喉返神经;第3组,视觉识别喉返神经并进行肌电图监测。喉返神经监测采用双极针电极,通过环甲膜置入声带肌。
永久性喉返神经麻痹的危险因素包括复发性良性和恶性甲状腺肿(优势比[OR]分别为4.7和6.7)、甲状腺恶性肿瘤的初次手术(OR为2.0)、叶切除术(OR为1.8)、未进行神经识别(OR为1.4)、低或中等手术量的医院(OR为1.3)以及低手术量的外科医生(OR为1.2)。
基于这些数据,视觉神经识别被确定为甲状腺手术中喉返神经处理的金标准。在扩大的甲状腺切除手术中,喉返神经监测是一种有前景的神经识别和保护工具。然而,由于喉返神经麻痹的总体发生率较低,在本研究中与仅进行视觉神经识别相比未达到统计学差异。