Hsiao Allen L, Baker M Douglas
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8064, USA.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005 Feb;17(1):56-61. doi: 10.1097/01.mop.0000151781.13635.70.
Evaluation of a febrile infant or child for serious bacterial infections (SBI) can be a challenging task; there is no single reliable predictor of SBI in infants. This review examines some of the recent work evaluating the usefulness of indicators for SBI, such as white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6).
While WBC is traditionally used as an indicator of serious infection, it appears to be the least specific and sensitive test in children. CRP and PCT are the most promising, but neither is an ideal single indicator by itself, especially in infants. There has been very limited experience with PCT in this country, however. IL-6 is more useful than WBC but less accurate than either CRP or PCT.
Much progress has been made in recent years in finding more accurate indicators of SBI than WBC. However, while recent developments have given clinicians some new tools in evaluating febrile infants and children, it remains a formidable undertaking. In the especially vulnerable infant population, the holy grail of a single ideal SBI indicator remains elusive.
评估发热婴幼儿是否患有严重细菌感染(SBI)是一项具有挑战性的任务;对于婴儿,没有单一可靠的SBI预测指标。本综述探讨了近期一些评估SBI指标(如白细胞计数(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6))效用的研究工作。
虽然传统上WBC被用作严重感染的指标,但它似乎是儿童中特异性和敏感性最低的检测方法。CRP和PCT最具前景,但单独使用时都不是理想的单一指标,尤其是在婴儿中。然而,该国在PCT方面的经验非常有限。IL-6比WBC更有用,但不如CRP或PCT准确。
近年来,在寻找比WBC更准确的SBI指标方面取得了很大进展。然而,尽管近期的进展为临床医生评估发热婴幼儿提供了一些新工具,但这仍然是一项艰巨的任务。在特别脆弱的婴儿群体中,单一理想的SBI指标这一圣杯仍然难以捉摸。