Semple R K, Meirhaeghe A, Vidal-Puig A J, Schwabe J W R, Wiggins D, Gibbons G F, Gurnell M, Chatterjee V K K, O'Rahilly S
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QR, United Kingdom.
Endocrinology. 2005 Apr;146(4):1871-82. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1405. Epub 2005 Jan 20.
Several missense mutations in the ligand-binding domain of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma have been described in subjects with dominantly inherited severe insulin resistance associated with partial lipodystrophy, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. These mutant receptors behave as dominant-negative inhibitors of PPARgamma signaling when studied in transfected cells. The extent to which such dominant-negative effects extend to signaling through other coexpressed PPAR isoforms has not been evaluated. To examine these issues further, we have created a PPARalpha mutant harboring twin substitutions, Leu459Ala and Glu462Ala, within the ligand binding domain (PPARalpha(mut)), examined its signaling properties, and compared the effects of dominant-negative PPARalpha and PPARgamma mutants on basal and ligand-induced gene transcription in adipocytes and hepatocytes. PPARalpha(mut) was transcriptionally inactive, repressed basal activity from a PPAR response element-containing promoter, inhibited the coactivator function of cotransfected PPAR-gamma coactivator 1alpha, and strongly inhibited the transcriptional response to cotransfected wild-type receptor. In contrast to PPARgamma, wild-type PPARalpha failed to recruit the transcriptional corepressors NCoR and SMRT. However, PPARalpha(mut) avidly recruited these corepressors in a ligand-dissociable manner. In hepatocytes and adipocytes, both PPARalpha(mut) and the corresponding PPARgamma mutant were capable of inhibiting the expression of genes primarily regulated by PPARalpha, -gamma, or -delta ligands, albeit with some differences in potency. Thus, dominant-negative forms of PPARalpha and PPARgamma are capable of interfering with PPAR signaling in a manner that is not wholly restricted to their cognate target genes. These findings may have implications for the pathogenesis of human syndromes resulting from mutations in this family of transcription factors.
在患有与部分脂肪营养不良、高血压和血脂异常相关的显性遗传严重胰岛素抵抗的受试者中,已发现人类过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)γ配体结合域存在几种错义突变。在转染细胞中研究时,这些突变受体表现为PPARγ信号传导的显性负性抑制剂。此类显性负性效应扩展至通过其他共表达的PPAR亚型进行信号传导的程度尚未得到评估。为了进一步研究这些问题,我们构建了一个在配体结合域内具有Leu459Ala和Glu462Ala双取代的PPARα突变体(PPARα(mut)),检测其信号传导特性,并比较显性负性PPARα和PPARγ突变体对脂肪细胞和肝细胞中基础和配体诱导的基因转录的影响。PPARα(mut)转录无活性,抑制含PPAR反应元件启动子的基础活性,抑制共转染的PPAR-γ共激活因子1α的共激活功能,并强烈抑制对共转染野生型受体的转录反应。与PPARγ不同,野生型PPARα未能募集转录共抑制因子NCoR和SMRT。然而,PPARα(mut)以配体可解离的方式强烈募集这些共抑制因子。在肝细胞和脂肪细胞中,PPARα(mut)和相应的PPARγ突变体均能够抑制主要由PPARα、-γ或-δ配体调节的基因的表达,尽管在效力上存在一些差异。因此,PPARα和PPARγ的显性负性形式能够以并非完全局限于其同源靶基因的方式干扰PPAR信号传导。这些发现可能对由该转录因子家族突变导致的人类综合征的发病机制具有启示意义。