Akansel Gur, Hendrix Lloyd, Erickson Beth A, Demirci Ali, Papke Anne, Arslan Arzu, Ciftci Ercument
Department of Radiology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, 41900 Derince, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Eur J Radiol. 2005 Feb;53(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.005.
To evaluate the potential of MRI in differentiating between malignant lymphomas and atypical lymphocytic infiltrates in the orbit.
MRI, clinical and histopathological findings in 30 patients presenting with orbital lymphoproliferative diseases (malignant lymphoma and atypical lymphocytic infiltrates) were evaluated.
MRI detected 28 out of 30 (93%) orbital lymphoid tumors. Seven out of eight (87.5%) atypical lymphocytic infiltrates and 21/22 (95.4%) of malignant lymphomas were detected. One conjunctival malignant lymphoma and one conjunctival atypical lymphocytic infiltrate were missed. Only malignant lymphoma lesions were hyperintense compared to the extraocular muscles on precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted images. The lacrimal duct was involved only with malignant lymphoma. Bilateral disease was more likely to be malignant lymphoma. Intraconal lesions were more likely to be associated with lesions elsewhere. No malignant lymphoma involved the extraconal fat. Only intraconal atypical lymphocytic infiltrates had indistinct margins.
In the orbit, MRI features alone may not allow clear-cut differentiation of malignant lymphomas from atypical lymphocytic infiltrates. However, certain imaging features increase the likelihood of distinguishing them. MRI may miss conjunctival disease. Both orbits should be imaged when orbital lymphoid disease is a probability. The presence of intraconal disease should prompt a search for lesions elsewhere. The use of a head coil instead of a superficial coil may be advantageous by eliminating coil shine effect and allowing evaluation of both orbits. Comparison of lesion signal to extraocular muscle signal appears to be a better alternative than cerebral gray matter or periorbital fat in differentiating malignant lymphoma from atypical lymphocytic infiltrates. Since imaging findings overlap, histopathological diagnosis is necessary in all cases.
评估磁共振成像(MRI)在鉴别眼眶恶性淋巴瘤和非典型淋巴细胞浸润方面的潜力。
对30例患有眼眶淋巴增殖性疾病(恶性淋巴瘤和非典型淋巴细胞浸润)患者的MRI、临床及组织病理学检查结果进行评估。
MRI检测出30例眼眶淋巴样肿瘤中的28例(93%)。检测出8例非典型淋巴细胞浸润中的7例(87.5%)以及22例恶性淋巴瘤中的21例(95.4%)。漏诊1例结膜恶性淋巴瘤和1例结膜非典型淋巴细胞浸润。在增强前和增强后的T1加权图像上,仅恶性淋巴瘤病灶相对于眼外肌呈高信号。泪腺管仅受累于恶性淋巴瘤。双侧病变更可能为恶性淋巴瘤。肌锥内病变更可能与其他部位的病变相关。无恶性淋巴瘤累及肌锥外脂肪。仅肌锥内非典型淋巴细胞浸润边界不清。
在眼眶,仅靠MRI特征可能无法明确区分恶性淋巴瘤与非典型淋巴细胞浸润。然而,某些影像学特征增加了鉴别二者的可能性。MRI可能漏诊结膜疾病。当怀疑眼眶淋巴样疾病时,应双侧眼眶成像。肌锥内疾病的存在应促使检查其他部位是否存在病变。使用头部线圈而非表面线圈可能具有优势,可消除线圈伪影并能对双侧眼眶进行评估。在区分恶性淋巴瘤与非典型淋巴细胞浸润时,将病变信号与眼外肌信号进行比较似乎比与脑灰质或眶周脂肪比较更好。由于影像学表现存在重叠,所有病例均需进行组织病理学诊断。