Suppr超能文献

乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)作为强化植物提取重金属的潜在土壤改良剂的比较

Comparison of EDTA and EDDS as potential soil amendments for enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals.

作者信息

Meers E, Ruttens A, Hopgood M J, Samson D, Tack F M G

机构信息

Department of Applied Analytical and Physical Chemistry, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry and Applied Ecochemistry, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Chemosphere. 2005 Feb;58(8):1011-22. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.047.

Abstract

Phytoextraction has been proposed as an alternative remediation technology for soils polluted with heavy metals or radionuclides, but is generally conceived as too slow working. Enhancing the accumulation of trace pollutants in harvestable plant tissues is a prerequisite for the technology to be practically applicable. The chelating aminopolycarboxylic acid, ethylene diamine tetraacetate (EDTA), has been found to enhance shoot accumulation of heavy metals. However, the use of EDTA in phytoextraction may not be suitable due to its high environmental persistence, which may lead to groundwater contamination. This paper aims to assess whether ethylene diamine disuccinate (EDDS), a biodegradable chelator, can be used for enhanced phytoextraction purposes. A laboratory experiment was conducted to examine mobilisation of Cd, Cu, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn into the soil solution upon application of EDTA or EDDS. The longevity of the induced mobilisation was monitored for a period of 40 days after application. Estimated effect half lives ranged between 3.8 and 7.5 days for EDDS, depending on the applied dose. The minimum observed effect half life of EDTA was 36 days, while for the highest applied dose no decrease was observed throughout the 40 day period of the mobilisation experiment. Performance of EDTA and EDDS for phytoextraction was evaluated by application to Helianthus annuus. Two other potential chelators, known for their biodegradability in comparison to EDTA, were tested in the plant experiment: nitrilo acetic acid (NTA) and citric acid. Uptake of heavy metals was higher in EDDS-treated pots than in EDTA-treated pots. The effects were still considered insufficiently high to consider efficient remediation. This may be partly due to the choice of timing for application of the soil amendment. Fixing the time of application at an earlier point before harvest may yield better results. NTA and citric acid induced no significant effects on heavy metal uptake.

摘要

植物提取已被提议作为一种修复受重金属或放射性核素污染土壤的替代技术,但一般认为其作用速度过慢。提高可收获植物组织中微量污染物的积累量是该技术实际应用的前提条件。已发现螯合氨基多羧酸乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)可促进重金属在地上部的积累。然而,由于EDTA在环境中具有高持久性,可能导致地下水污染,因此在植物提取中使用EDTA可能并不合适。本文旨在评估可生物降解的螯合剂乙二胺二琥珀酸(EDDS)是否可用于强化植物提取。进行了一项实验室实验,以研究施用EDTA或EDDS后镉、铜、铬、镍、铅和锌向土壤溶液中的迁移情况。施用后对诱导迁移的持续时间进行了40天的监测。根据施用剂量不同,EDDS的估计效应半衰期在3.8至7.5天之间。EDTA的最小观测效应半衰期为36天,而在迁移实验的40天期间,对于最高施用剂量未观察到下降。通过对向日葵施用EDTA和EDDS来评估它们在植物提取方面的性能。在植物实验中还测试了另外两种与EDTA相比具有生物降解性的潜在螯合剂:氮川三乙酸(NTA)和柠檬酸。EDDS处理的花盆中重金属的吸收量高于EDTA处理的花盆。但这些效果仍被认为不够高,不足以实现高效修复。这可能部分归因于土壤改良剂施用时间的选择。在收获前更早的时间施用可能会产生更好的效果。NTA和柠檬酸对重金属吸收没有显著影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验