Suppr超能文献

强化植物提取:寻找乙二胺四乙酸替代品

Enhanced phytoextraction: in search of EDTA alternatives.

作者信息

Meers E, Hopgood M, Lesage E, Vervaeke P, Tack F M G, Verloo M G

机构信息

Department of Applied Analytical and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Applied Biological Science, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Phytoremediation. 2004;6(2):95-109. doi: 10.1080/16226510490454777.

Abstract

Enhanced phytoextraction proposes the use of soil amendments to increase the heavy-metal content of above-ground harvestable plant tissues. This study compares the effect of synthetic aminopolycarboxylic acids [ethylenediamine tetraacetatic acid (EDTA), nitriloacetic acid (NTA), and diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA)] with a number of biodegradable, low-molecular weight, organic acids (citric acid, ascorbic acid, oxalic acid, salicylic acid, and NH4 acetate) as potential soil amendments for enhancing phytoextraction of heavy metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Ni) by Zea mays. The treatments in this study were applied at a dose of 2 mmol/kg(-1) 1 d before sowing. To compare possible effects between presow and postgermination treatments, a second smaller experiment was conducted in which EDTA, citric acid, and NH4 acetate were added 10 d after germination as opposed to 1 d before sowing. The soil used in this screening was a moderately contaminated topsoil derived from a dredged sediment disposal site. This site has been in an oxidized state for more than 8 years before being used in this research. The high carbonate, high organic matter, and high clay content characteristic to this type of sediment are thought to suppress heavy-metal phytoavailability. Both EDTA and DTPA resulted in increased levels of heavy metals in the above-ground biomass. However, the observed increases in uptake were not as large as reported in the literature. Neither the NTA nor organic acid treatments had any significant effect on uptake when applied prior to sowing. This was attributed to the rapid mineralization of these substances and the relatively low doses applied. The generally low extraction observed in this experiment restricts the use of phytoextraction as an effective remediation alternative under the current conditions, with regard to amendments used, applied dose (2 mmol/kg(-1) soil), application time (presow), plant species (Zea mays), and sediment (calcareous clayey soil) under study.

摘要

强化植物提取技术建议使用土壤改良剂来增加地上可收获植物组织中的重金属含量。本研究比较了合成氨基多羧酸[乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、氮川三乙酸(NTA)和二亚乙基三胺五乙酸(DTPA)]与多种可生物降解的低分子量有机酸(柠檬酸、抗坏血酸、草酸、水杨酸和乙酸铵)作为潜在土壤改良剂对玉米强化提取重金属(铜、锌、镉、铅和镍)的效果。本研究中的处理在播种前1天以2 mmol/kg(-1)的剂量施用。为了比较播种前和发芽后处理之间可能存在的影响,进行了第二个规模较小的实验,在该实验中,与播种前1天相反,在发芽10天后添加EDTA、柠檬酸和乙酸铵。本筛选实验中使用的土壤是取自一个疏浚沉积物处置场的中度污染表土。该场地在用于本研究之前已处于氧化状态超过8年。这种沉积物类型特有的高碳酸盐、高有机质和高粘土含量被认为会抑制重金属的植物有效性。EDTA和DTPA都导致地上生物量中的重金属含量增加。然而,观察到的吸收量增加幅度不如文献报道的大。播种前施用时,NTA和有机酸处理对吸收均无显著影响。这归因于这些物质的快速矿化以及施用剂量相对较低。就所使用的改良剂、施用剂量(2 mmol/kg(-1)土壤)、施用时间(播种前)、植物种类(玉米)和所研究的沉积物(钙质粘土)而言,在当前条件下,本实验中观察到的总体较低提取率限制了植物提取作为一种有效修复替代方法的应用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验