Suppr超能文献

通过一条独立于干扰素信号传导的途径对IRF7启动子转录活性的调控。

Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the IRF7 promoter by a pathway independent of interferon signaling.

作者信息

Ning Shunbin, Huye Leslie E, Pagano Joseph S

机构信息

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.

出版信息

J Biol Chem. 2005 Apr 1;280(13):12262-70. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404260200. Epub 2005 Jan 21.

Abstract

Genes containing an interferon (IFN)-stimulated response element (ISRE) can be divided into two groups according to their inducibility by IFN and virus infection: one induced only by IFN and the other induced by both IFN and virus infection. Although it is now clear that IFN regulatory factor 7 (IRF7) is a multifunctional gene essential for induction of type I IFNs, regulation of the IRF7 promoter (IRF7p) is poorly understood. The IRF7 gene includes two IFN responsive elements, an IRF-binding element (IRFE) in the promoter region and an ISRE in the first intron, and is induced by the IFN-triggered Jak-STAT pathway by binding of the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) complex to the ISRE. In this study, we demonstrate that IRF3 and IRF7, which with the coactivators CREB-binding protein and P300 form the virus-activated factor (VAF) complex upon Sendai virus infection, bind to the IRF7 ISRE and IRFE and can directly activate IRF7 transcription. Promoter reporter assays show that both the ISRE and IRFE are responsive to activation by IRF7 and IRF3. In cells transiently expressing IRF7 or/and IRF3, the VAF level and binding of VAF are clearly increased after Sendai virus infection. Studies with Jak1 kinase inactive 293 cells that were stably transfected with a Jak1 kinase dead dominant negative construct, and the mutant cell lines SAN (IFNalpha-/beta-), U2A (IRF9-), U4A (Jak1-), and DKO (IRF1-/IRF2-) show that the IRF7 transcription activated directly by VAF is distinct from and independent of the IFN signaling pathway. Thus, IRF7 transcription is autoregulated by binding of the IRF7-containing VAF to its own ISRE and IRFE. The results show two distinct mechanisms for the activation of the IRF7 promoter, by IFN and by virus infection. A regulatory network between type I IFNs and IRF7 is proposed. The distinct pathways may reflect special roles for an efficient antiviral response at different stages of virus infection.

摘要

含有干扰素(IFN)刺激反应元件(ISRE)的基因可根据其对IFN和病毒感染的诱导性分为两组:一组仅由IFN诱导,另一组由IFN和病毒感染共同诱导。尽管现在已经清楚干扰素调节因子7(IRF7)是诱导I型IFN所必需的多功能基因,但对IRF7启动子(IRF7p)的调控了解甚少。IRF7基因包含两个IFN反应元件,一个位于启动子区域的IRF结合元件(IRFE)和一个位于第一内含子的ISRE,并通过IFN刺激基因因子3(ISGF3)复合物与ISRE结合,由IFN触发的Jak-STAT途径诱导。在本研究中,我们证明了IRF3和IRF7在仙台病毒感染后与共激活因子CREB结合蛋白和P300形成病毒激活因子(VAF)复合物,它们与IRF7的ISRE和IRFE结合,并可直接激活IRF7转录。启动子报告基因分析表明,ISRE和IRFE均对IRF7和IRF3的激活有反应。在瞬时表达IRF7或/和IRF3的细胞中,仙台病毒感染后VAF水平和VAF的结合明显增加。对稳定转染Jak1激酶失活显性负性构建体的Jak1激酶失活293细胞以及突变细胞系SAN(IFNα/β-)、U2A(IRF9-)、U4A(Jak1-)和DKO(IRF1-/IRF2-)的研究表明,VAF直接激活的IRF7转录与IFN信号通路不同且独立。因此,IRF7转录通过含IRF7的VAF与其自身的ISRE和IRFE结合而实现自我调节。结果显示了激活IRF7启动子的两种不同机制,即由IFN和病毒感染激活。提出了I型IFN与IRF7之间的调控网络。不同的途径可能反映了在病毒感染不同阶段有效抗病毒反应的特殊作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验