Chin J Dig Dis. 2005;6(1):26-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-9573.2005.00183.x.
To analyze the differences and similarities between patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who had been clinically diagnosed (CD) and those detected by mass screening (MS), and thus clarify the practical significance of CRC screening in China.
All the data for the CRC patients in the CD group were collected by registration through a cohort study, and the patients in the MS group were selected from mass screening of a natural population of 19 852 in Beijing Metropolitan area. CRC was confirmed pathologically in both groups.
Patients over the age of 50 years with CRC comprised 81.9% of the CD group and 83.3% of the MS group; the percentage of Dukes A + B was 41.1% and 91.7%, respectively; 0.28% of individuals with risk factors in the MS group were found to have CRC, whereas 0.05% did not (P < 0.05). Endoscopically, 44.7% of the protruding type CRC were Dukes A or B compared with only 10% of the ulcerated type (chi(2) = 22.304, P < 0.001). The positivity rate of the fecal occult blood (FOB) test was 79.9% in Dukes A + B and 82.0% in Dukes C + D, showing no difference between the FOB test and Dukes staging in diagnosing CRC (chi(2) = 0.087, P = 0.768). The percentage of patients with increased serum concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen in Dukes C + D was significantly higher than that in Dukes A + B (chi(2) = 5.547, P = 0.019). Among the moderately and well-differentiated CRC, 51.8% (159/307) were Dukes A + B, resulting in a significant difference (chi(2) = 14.504, P < 0.001). There was a familial history of malignancies in 17.9% of CRC cases and 14.6% of their first-degree relatives suffered from malignant tumors.
The incidence of CRC in Beijing Metropolitan area has been rising significantly. The staging and prognosis of CRC involves symptomatology, laboratory tests, endoscopic findings and pathologic characteristics. Mass screening is effective for detecting early CRC in China.
分析临床诊断(CD)的结直肠癌(CRC)患者与通过大规模筛查(MS)发现的患者之间的异同,从而阐明中国CRC筛查的实际意义。
通过队列研究登记收集CD组CRC患者的所有数据,MS组患者从北京大都市地区19852名自然人群的大规模筛查中选取。两组均经病理确诊CRC。
50岁以上的CRC患者在CD组中占81.9%,在MS组中占83.3%;Dukes A + B期的比例分别为41.1%和91.7%;MS组中有危险因素的个体中0.28%被发现患有CRC,而0.05%未患CRC(P < 0.05)。在内镜检查中,44.7%的隆起型CRC为Dukes A或B期,而溃疡型仅为10%(χ² = 22.304,P < 0.001)。粪便潜血(FOB)试验的阳性率在Dukes A + B期为79.9%,在Dukes C + D期为82.0%,显示FOB试验与Dukes分期在诊断CRC方面无差异(χ² = 0.087,P = 0.768)。Dukes C + D期患者血清癌胚抗原浓度升高的比例显著高于Dukes A + B期(χ² = 5.547,P = 0.019)。在中分化和高分化CRC中,51.8%(159/307)为Dukes A + B期,差异有统计学意义(χ² = 14.504,P < 0.001)。17.9%的CRC病例有恶性肿瘤家族史,其一级亲属中有14.6%患有恶性肿瘤。
北京大都市地区CRC的发病率显著上升。CRC的分期和预后涉及症状、实验室检查、内镜检查结果和病理特征。在中国,大规模筛查对早期CRC的检测是有效的。