Ceilley Elizabeth, Jagsi Reshma, Goldberg Saveli, Grignon Laurent, Kachnic Lisa, Powell Simon, Taghian Alphonse
Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):365-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.069.
To document and explain the current radiotherapeutic management of invasive breast cancer in North America and Europe. We also identified a number of areas of agreement, as well as controversy, toward which additional clinical research should be directed.
An original survey questionnaire was developed to assess radiation oncologists' self-reported management of breast cancer. The questionnaire was administered to physician members of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. We present the results of the comparative analysis of 702 responses from North America and 435 responses from Europe.
Several areas of national and international controversy were identified, including the selection of appropriate candidates for postmastectomy radiation therapy (RT) and the appropriate management of the regional lymph nodes after mastectomy, as well as after lumpectomy. Only 40.7% and 36.1% of respondents would use postmastectomy RT in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes in North America and Europe, respectively. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was offered more frequently by North American than European respondents (p <0.0001) and more frequently by academic than nonacademic respondents in North America (p < 0.05). The average radiation fraction size was larger in Europe than in North America (p < 0.01). European respondents offered RT to the internal mammary chain more often than did the North American respondents (p < 0.001). North American respondents were more likely to offer RT to the supraclavicular fossa (p < 0.001) and axilla (p < 0.01).
Marked differences were found in physician opinions regarding the management of breast cancer, with statistically significant international differences in patterns of care. This survey highlighted areas of controversy, providing support for international randomized trials to optimize the RT management of invasive breast cancer.
记录并解释北美和欧洲目前对浸润性乳腺癌的放射治疗管理。我们还确定了一些达成共识以及存在争议的领域,应针对这些领域开展更多临床研究。
设计了一份原始调查问卷,以评估放射肿瘤学家自我报告的乳腺癌管理情况。该问卷发放给了美国放射治疗及肿瘤学会和欧洲放射治疗及肿瘤学会的医师会员。我们展示了对来自北美的702份回复和来自欧洲的435份回复的对比分析结果。
确定了几个国内和国际上存在争议的领域,包括乳房切除术后放射治疗(RT)合适候选人的选择,以及乳房切除术后、保乳术后区域淋巴结的合适管理。在北美和欧洲,分别只有40.7%和36.1%的受访者会对有1 - 3个阳性淋巴结的患者采用乳房切除术后RT。北美受访者比欧洲受访者更频繁地提供前哨淋巴结活检(p < 0.0001),在北美,学术机构的受访者比非学术机构的受访者更频繁地提供前哨淋巴结活检(p < 0.05)。欧洲的平均放射分次剂量比北美更大(p < 0.01)。欧洲受访者比北美受访者更频繁地对乳房内淋巴结链进行RT(p < 0.001)。北美受访者更有可能对锁骨上窝(p < 0.001)和腋窝(p < 0.01)进行RT。
在乳腺癌管理的医师意见方面发现了显著差异,在护理模式上存在具有统计学意义的国际差异。这项调查突出了争议领域,为优化浸润性乳腺癌的RT管理的国际随机试验提供了支持。