Swanick Cameron W, Lei Xiudong, Shaitelman Simona F, Schlembach Pamela J, Bloom Elizabeth S, Fingeret Michelle C, Strom Eric A, Tereffe Welela, Woodward Wendy A, Stauder Michael C, Dvorak Tomas, Thompson Alastair M, Buchholz Thomas A, Smith Benjamin D
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Cancer. 2016 Sep 15;122(18):2886-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30121. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
The authors compared longitudinal patient-reported outcomes and physician-rated cosmesis with conventionally fractionated whole-breast irradiation (CF-WBI) versus hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (HF-WBI) within the context of a randomized trial.
From 2011 to 2014, a total of 287 women with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage 0 to stage II breast cancer were randomized to receive CF-WBI (at a dose of 50 grays in 25 fractions plus a tumor bed boost) or HF-WBI (at a dose of 42.56 grays in 16 fractions plus a tumor bed boost) after breast-conserving surgery. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast, and the Body Image Scale and were recorded at baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 years after radiotherapy. Physician-rated cosmesis was assessed at the same time points. Outcomes by treatment arm were compared at each time point using a 2-sided Student t test. Multivariable mixed effects growth curve models assessed the effects of treatment arm and time on longitudinal outcomes.
Of the 287 patients enrolled, 149 were randomized to CF-WBI and 138 were randomized to HF-WBI. At 2 years, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Trial Outcome Index score was found to be modestly better in the HF-WBI arm (mean 79.6 vs 75.9 for CF-WBI; P = .02). In multivariable mixed effects models, treatment arm was not found to be associated with longitudinal outcomes after adjusting for time and baseline outcome measures (P≥.14). The linear effect of time was significant for BCTOS measures of functional status (P = .001, improved with time) and breast pain (P = .002, improved with time).
In this randomized trial, longitudinal outcomes did not appear to differ by treatment arm. Patient-reported functional and pain outcomes improved over time. These findings are relevant when counseling patients regarding decisions concerning radiotherapy. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2886-2894. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
在一项随机试验的背景下,作者比较了传统分割全乳照射(CF-WBI)与大分割全乳照射(HF-WBI)患者报告的纵向结局以及医生评定的美容效果。
2011年至2014年,共有287例美国癌症联合委员会0期至II期乳腺癌女性患者在保乳手术后被随机分组,分别接受CF-WBI(25次分割,总剂量50格雷,外加瘤床加量照射)或HF-WBI(16次分割,总剂量42.56格雷,外加瘤床加量照射)。使用乳腺癌治疗结局量表(BCTOS)、癌症治疗功能评价量表-乳腺版以及身体意象量表评估患者报告的结局,并在放疗前基线以及放疗后0.5年、1年、2年和3年进行记录。同时在相同时间点评估医生评定的美容效果。使用双侧学生t检验比较各时间点不同治疗组的结局。多变量混合效应生长曲线模型评估治疗组和时间对纵向结局的影响。
在纳入的287例患者中,149例被随机分配至CF-WBI组,138例被随机分配至HF-WBI组。在2年时,发现HF-WBI组的癌症治疗功能评价量表-乳腺试验结局指数评分略高(HF-WBI组平均为79.6,CF-WBI组为75.9;P = 0.02)。在多变量混合效应模型中,在对时间和基线结局指标进行校正后,未发现治疗组与纵向结局相关(P≥0.14)。时间的线性效应对于BCTOS功能状态指标(P = 0.001,随时间改善)和乳腺疼痛指标(P = 0.002,随时间改善)具有显著意义。
在这项随机试验中,不同治疗组的纵向结局似乎没有差异。患者报告的功能和疼痛结局随时间改善。这些发现对于为患者提供放疗决策咨询具有参考价值。《癌症》2016年。©2016美国癌症协会。《癌症》2016;122:2886 - 2894。©2016美国癌症协会。