Rundle Andrew
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 West 168th Street, Room 730, New York, NY 10040, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jan;14(1):227-36.
As in other areas of epidemiology, researchers studying physical activity and cancer have begun to include laboratory analyses of biological specimens in their studies. The incorporation of these "biomarkers" into epidemiology has been termed molecular epidemiology and is an approach primarily developed to study chemical carcinogens. Thus far, there has been no discussion in the field on how the established molecular epidemiologic framework might be adapted for research into physical activity, what methodologic needs exist, what the goals of such an approach might be, and what limitations exist. This article relates the literature on molecular epidemiology to the needs of physical activity research and tries to set research priorities for the field as it moves in this new direction. Although this approach will be very useful for investigating the mechanisms through which physical activity exerts effects, there are several challenges for physical activity epidemiologists in adapting molecular epidemiologic approaches. Primarily, there are currently no available biomarkers that might be considered measures of exposure or biologically effective dose. In addition, most available biomarkers of intermediate effects have been tested in training studies at activity levels much higher than those seen in population-based epidemiologic studies. Thus, it is not clear whether these biomarkers are valid at lower activity levels. Furthermore, the nature of the relationship between activity and many available biomarkers depends very much on the context of the activity. Addressing these issues should be a priority if we are to develop a molecular epidemiologic paradigm for studying physical activity.
与流行病学的其他领域一样,研究身体活动与癌症的研究人员已开始在其研究中纳入对生物标本的实验室分析。将这些“生物标志物”纳入流行病学被称为分子流行病学,这是一种主要为研究化学致癌物而发展起来的方法。到目前为止,该领域尚未讨论如何调整既定的分子流行病学框架以用于身体活动研究、存在哪些方法学需求、这种方法的目标可能是什么以及存在哪些局限性。本文将分子流行病学的文献与身体活动研究的需求联系起来,并试图在该领域朝着这个新方向发展时确定研究重点。尽管这种方法对于研究身体活动发挥作用的机制非常有用,但身体活动流行病学家在采用分子流行病学方法时面临若干挑战。主要问题在于,目前没有可用的生物标志物可被视为暴露或生物有效剂量的测量指标。此外,大多数可用的中间效应生物标志物已在训练研究中进行测试,其活动水平远高于基于人群的流行病学研究中的水平。因此,尚不清楚这些生物标志物在较低活动水平时是否有效。此外,活动与许多可用生物标志物之间关系的性质在很大程度上取决于活动的背景。如果我们要开发一种用于研究身体活动的分子流行病学范式,解决这些问题应成为优先事项。