Meskers Carel G M, Koppe Peter A, Konijnenbelt Manin H, Veeger Dirkjan H E J, Janssen Thomas W J
Rehabilitation Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Feb;84(2):97-105. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000150792.26793.e9.
To evaluate the assumption that shoulder kinematic patterns of the ipsilateral, nonparetic shoulder in hemiplegia are similar to kinematics recorded in a healthy population.
Case control study of a convenience sample of ten patients with hemiplegia due to stroke in the subacute phase compared with a control group of similar age. Three-dimensional positions of the scapula and humerus were measured and expressed in Euler angles as a function of active arm elevation in the frontal and sagittal plane and during passive humeral internal/external rotation at an elevation angle of 90 degrees in the frontal and sagittal plane.
Compared with controls, in the ipsilateral shoulder of patients, we found both a statistically significant diminished scapular protraction during elevation in the sagittal plane (35 +/- 5 vs. 51 +/- 8 degrees at 110 degrees of humeral elevation) and humeral external rotation during arm elevation in the frontal plane (51 +/- 7 vs. 69 +/- 14 degrees at 110 degrees of humeral elevation). Maximal passive humeral external rotation was found to be impaired in the frontal (64 +/- 13 vs. 98 +/- 14 degrees) and sagittal planes (65 +/- 11 vs. 94 +/- 12 degrees). In addition, there was significantly diminished anterior spinal tilt during humeral internal rotation (-5 +/- 10 vs. -20 +/- 9 degrees) and diminished posterior spinal tilt during external rotation in the frontal plane (-14 +/- 8 vs. -3 +/- 6 degrees). Maximal thoracohumeral elevation in patients was significantly impaired (126 +/- 12 vs. 138 +/- 8 degrees).
Clear kinematic changes in the ipsilateral shoulder in patients with hemiplegia were found, indicating underlying alterations in muscle contraction patterns. The cause remains speculative. These results suggest that the ipsilateral shoulder should not be considered to function normally beforehand.
评估偏瘫患者患侧非瘫痪侧肩部运动学模式与健康人群所记录的运动学模式相似这一假设。
对亚急性期因中风导致偏瘫的10例患者的便利样本进行病例对照研究,并与年龄相仿的对照组进行比较。测量肩胛骨和肱骨的三维位置,并以欧拉角表示,作为在额面和矢状面主动上肢抬高以及在额面和矢状面90度抬高角度下被动肱骨内/外旋转过程中的函数。
与对照组相比,在患者的患侧肩部,我们发现,在矢状面抬高过程中肩胛骨前伸明显减少(肱骨抬高110度时为35±5度对51±8度),在额面上肢抬高过程中肱骨外旋减少(肱骨抬高110度时为51±7度对69±14度),差异均有统计学意义。发现最大被动肱骨外旋在额面(64±1-度对98±14度)和矢状面(65±11度对94±12度)受损。此外,肱骨内旋时脊柱前倾角明显减小(-5±10度对-20±9度),额面外旋时脊柱后倾角减小(-14±8度对-3±6度)。患者的最大胸肱抬高明显受损(126±12度对138±8度)。
发现偏瘫患者患侧肩部存在明显的运动学变化,表明肌肉收缩模式存在潜在改变。其原因仍属推测。这些结果表明,患侧肩部不应预先被认为功能正常。