Bowden Charles L, Grunze Heinz, Mullen Jamie, Brecher Martin, Paulsson Björn, Jones Martin, Vågerö Mårten, Svensson K
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;66(1):111-21. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v66n0116.
To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine monotherapy versus placebo for the treatment of mania associated with bipolar disorder.
In an international, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week study, patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder (manic episode) were randomly assigned to treatment with quetiapine (flexibly dosed up to 800 mg/day), placebo, or lithium. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score at day 21. Data were gathered from April 2001 to May 2002.
More patients in the quetiapine (72/107) and lithium (67/98) groups completed the study compared with the placebo group (35/97). Improvement (reduction) in YMRS score was significantly greater for quetiapine than placebo at day 7 (-8.03 vs. -4.89; p < .01), and the difference between groups continued to increase over time to day 21 (-14.6 vs. -6.7; p < .001) and to endpoint at day 84 (-20.3 vs. -9.0; p < .001). Significantly more quetiapine patients compared with placebo patients fulfilled YMRS response criteria at day 21 (53.3% vs. 27.4%; p < .001) and at day 84 (72.0% vs. 41.1%; p < .001). Quetiapine was also superior to placebo in efficacy at day 21 and day 84 by all secondary measures. Lithium-treated patients improved significantly compared with placebo patients and similarly to quetiapine-treated patients on the primary efficacy measure. The most common adverse events for quetiapine were dry mouth, somnolence, and weight gain, while lithium was associated with tremor and insomnia. The quetiapine and placebo groups had similar, low levels of extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events.
Quetiapine demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo in patients with bipolar mania and was well tolerated.
评估喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂治疗双相情感障碍相关躁狂发作的疗效和耐受性。
在一项国际多中心双盲平行组12周研究中,将符合DSM-IV双相I型障碍(躁狂发作)诊断标准的患者随机分配接受喹硫平(灵活给药,最大剂量800毫克/天)、安慰剂或锂盐治疗。主要疗效指标是第21天时青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)评分相对于基线的变化。数据收集时间为2001年4月至2002年5月。
与安慰剂组(35/97)相比,喹硫平组(72/107)和锂盐组(67/98)完成研究的患者更多。在第7天时,喹硫平组YMRS评分的改善(降低)幅度显著大于安慰剂组(-8.03对-4.89;p<.01),且两组间差异随时间持续增大,至第21天时(-14.6对-6.7;p<.001)以及第84天终点时(-20.3对-9.0;p<.001)。在第21天和第84天时,达到YMRS反应标准的喹硫平组患者显著多于安慰剂组患者(分别为53.3%对27.4%;p<.001以及72.0%对41.1%;p<.001)。在第21天和第84天时,所有次要指标显示喹硫平的疗效也优于安慰剂。与安慰剂组患者相比,锂盐治疗组患者在主要疗效指标上有显著改善,且与喹硫平治疗组患者相似。喹硫平最常见的不良事件为口干、嗜睡和体重增加,而锂盐与震颤和失眠有关。喹硫平组和安慰剂组锥体外系症状相关不良事件的发生率较低且相似。
喹硫平在双相躁狂患者中显示出优于安慰剂的疗效,且耐受性良好。