Vieta Eduard, Mullen Jamie, Brecher Martin, Paulsson Björn, Jones Martin
Hospital Clinic, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Spain.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jun;21(6):923-34. doi: 10.1185/030079905X46340.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of quetiapine monotherapy for mania in bipolar disorder by an a priori defined combined analysis of data from two placebo-controlled studies.
The intent-to-treat (ITT) populations from two studies of patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder, manic episode, randomised to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with quetiapine (up to 800 mg/day) or placebo were combined. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score from baseline to Day 21. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in YMRS to Day 84, YMRS response and remission rates and change from baseline to Days 21 and 84 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar (CGI-BP) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). These endpoints were analysed as continuous variables, using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the baseline as covariate. In order to account for any difference in response between studies, the analyses were stratified by study as a fixed effect, and centre as a random effect. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to analyse binary variables. A chi square test was used to compare the frequency of adverse events between the treatment groups.
The combined analysis included a total of 403 patients from two quetiapine monotherapy studies in patients with bipolar I disorder. A significant improvement in YMRS score was observed from Day 4 (p = 0.021) onward in the quetiapine group compared with placebo. The treatment advantage of quetiapine over placebo continued to increase to Day 21 (p < 0.001) and Day 84 (p < 0.001). Significantly more quetiapine-treated than placebo-treated patients achieved a response (p < 0.001). The average quetiapine dose in responders was approximately 600 mg daily. Of adverse events occurring in > or = 5% of patients, quetiapine-treated patients had a significantly greater incidence versus placebo of somnolence (16.3% vs. 4.0%), dry mouth (15.8% vs. 3%), weight gain (9.1% vs. 1.5%) and dizziness (6.7% vs. 2.5%).
The data from this combined analysis support the results from the individual studies and indicate that quetiapine monotherapy is effective across a broad range of mood symptoms, fast-acting and well tolerated in the treatment of mania.
通过对两项安慰剂对照研究的数据进行预先定义的综合分析,评估喹硫平单药治疗双相情感障碍躁狂发作的疗效和安全性。
将两项针对符合DSM-IV双相I型障碍、躁狂发作的患者进行的研究中,随机接受喹硫平(最高800毫克/天)或安慰剂双盲治疗12周的意向性治疗(ITT)人群合并。主要疗效终点是从基线到第21天Young躁狂评定量表(YMRS)评分的变化。次要终点包括从基线到第84天YMRS的变化、YMRS反应和缓解率,以及从基线到第21天和第84天蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、临床总体印象(CGI)、双相情感障碍临床总体印象(CGI-BP)和阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)的变化。这些终点作为连续变量,使用协方差分析(ANCOVA),以基线作为协变量进行分析。为了考虑研究之间反应的任何差异,分析按研究作为固定效应、中心作为随机效应进行分层。采用 Cochr an-Mantel-Haenszel检验分析二元变量。使用卡方检验比较治疗组之间不良事件的发生率。
综合分析包括来自两项双相I型障碍患者喹硫平单药治疗研究的共403例患者。与安慰剂相比,喹硫平组从第4天起(p = 0.021)YMRS评分有显著改善。喹硫平相对于安慰剂的治疗优势持续增加至第21天(p < 0.001)和第84天(p < 0.001)。喹硫平治疗的患者达到反应的比例显著高于安慰剂治疗的患者(p < 0.001)。有反应患者的喹硫平平均日剂量约为600毫克。在发生率≥5%的不良事件中,喹硫平治疗的患者嗜睡(16.3%对4.0%)、口干(15.8%对3%)、体重增加(9.1%对1.5%)和头晕(6.7%对2.5%)的发生率显著高于安慰剂组。
该综合分析的数据支持了各单项研究的结果,表明喹硫平单药治疗在广泛的情绪症状方面有效,起效快且在治疗躁狂发作时耐受性良好。