Lee Patrick
Franciscan University, Steubenville, OH 43952, USA.
Christ Bioeth. 2004 Jan-Apr;10(1):7-31. doi: 10.1080/13803600490489834.
From the standpoint of a Christian philosopher, heeding the teaching and exhortations of Pope John Paul II and previous popes, I examine three directions in which the recent philosophical debate has developed. In the last seven or eight years there has been 1) a renewed focus on the biological issue of when a human individual comes to be, 2) new arguments for the proposition that personhood is a characteristic acquired after birth, and 3) refinements of the early argument of Judith Thomson. Replying to these developments, I defend, on philosophical grounds, the pro-life position. I argue that a distinct, whole (though immature) human individual comes to be at conception, that he or she is a person, with full moral worth, from the moment he or she comes to be, and the mothers and fathers have a special responsibility to their children which entails (at least) that they ought not to choose to abort them. I conclude by briefly indicating, from the standpoint of Christian faith, why Christian philosophers should vigorously pursue this debate.
从一位基督教哲学家的立场出发,遵循教皇约翰·保罗二世及前任教皇的教导与劝诫,我审视了近期哲学辩论所发展出的三个方向。在过去七八年里,出现了以下情况:1)重新聚焦于人类个体何时形成这一生物学问题;2)出现了关于人格是出生后获得的一种特征这一命题的新论证;3)对朱迪思·汤姆森早期论证的完善。针对这些发展情况,我从哲学角度捍卫生命权立场。我认为,一个独特的、完整的(尽管不成熟)人类个体在受孕之时就已形成,从其形成之时起,他或她就是一个具有完全道德价值的人,并且父母对其子女负有特殊责任,这至少意味着他们不应选择堕胎。最后,我从基督教信仰的角度简要说明为何基督教哲学家应积极参与这场辩论。