Suppr超能文献

对患有医学上无法解释症状的初级保健患者的DSM-IV标准的探索。

Exploration of DSM-IV criteria in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms.

作者信息

Smith Robert C, Gardiner Joseph C, Lyles Judith S, Sirbu Corina, Dwamena Francesca C, Hodges Annemarie, Collins Clare, Lein Catherine, Given C William, Given Barbara, Goddeeris John

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;67(1):123-9. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000149279.10978.3e.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Investigators and clinicians almost always rely on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edition's (DSM-IV) somatoform disorders (and its derivative diagnoses) to characterize and identify patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Our objective was to evaluate this use by determining the prevalence of DSM-IV somatoform and nonsomatoform disorders in patients with MUS proven by a gold standard chart review.

METHODS

In a community-based staff model HMO, we identified subjects for a clinical trial using a systematic and reliable chart rating procedure among high-utilizing MUS patients. Only baseline data are reported here. The World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview provided full and abridged DSM-IV diagnoses. Patients with full or abridged DSM-IV somatoform diagnoses were labeled "DSM somatoform-positive," whereas those without them were labeled "DSM somatoform-negative."

RESULTS

Two hundred six MUS patients averaged 13.6 visits in the year preceding study, 79.1% were females, and the average age was 47.7 years. We found that 124 patients (60.2%) had a nonsomatoform ("psychiatric") DSM-IV diagnosis of any type; 36 (17.5%) had 2 full nonsomatoform diagnoses, and 41 (19.9%) had >2; 92 (44.7%) had some full anxiety diagnosis and 94 (45.6%) had either full depression or minor depression diagnoses. However, only 9 of 206 (4.4%) had any full DSM-IV somatoform diagnosis, and only 39 (18.9%) had abridged somatization disorder. Thus, 48 (23.3%) were "DSM somatoform-positive" and 158 (76.7%) were "DSM somatoform-negative." The latter exhibited less anxiety, depression, mental dysfunction, and psychosomatic symptoms (all p <.001) and less physical dysfunction (p = .011). Correlates of this DSM somatoform-negative status were female gender (p = .007), less severe mental (p = .007), and physical dysfunction (p = .004), a decreased proportion of MUS (p <.10), and less psychiatric comorbidity (p <.10); c-statistic = 0.77.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that depression and anxiety characterized MUS patients better than the somatoform disorders. Our data suggested radically revising the somatoform disorders for DSM-V by incorporating a new, very large group of now-overlooked DSM somatoform-negative patients who were typically women with less severe dysfunction.

摘要

目的

研究者和临床医生几乎总是依赖《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中的躯体形式障碍(及其衍生诊断)来描述和识别有医学无法解释症状(MUS)的患者。我们的目的是通过金标准图表回顾确定MUS患者中DSM-IV躯体形式和非躯体形式障碍的患病率,以评估这种应用。

方法

在一个基于社区的员工模式健康维护组织(HMO)中,我们通过系统且可靠的图表评分程序,在高使用频率的MUS患者中识别出临床试验的受试者。这里仅报告基线数据。世界卫生组织综合国际诊断访谈提供了完整和简略的DSM-IV诊断。有完整或简略DSM-IV躯体形式诊断的患者被标记为“DSM躯体形式阳性”,而没有这些诊断的患者被标记为“DSM躯体形式阴性”。

结果

206名MUS患者在研究前一年平均就诊13.6次,79.1%为女性,平均年龄为47.7岁。我们发现124名患者(60.2%)有任何类型的非躯体形式(“精神”)DSM-IV诊断;36名(17.5%)有2种完整的非躯体形式诊断,41名(19.9%)有超过2种;92名(44.7%)有某种完整的焦虑诊断,94名(45.6%)有完整的抑郁或轻度抑郁诊断。然而,206名患者中只有9名(4.4%)有任何完整的DSM-IV躯体形式诊断,只有39名(18.9%)有简略的躯体化障碍。因此,48名(23.3%)为“DSM躯体形式阳性”,158名(76.7%)为“DSM躯体形式阴性”。后者表现出较少的焦虑、抑郁、精神功能障碍和心身症状(所有p<.001)以及较少的身体功能障碍(p =.011)。这种DSM躯体形式阴性状态的相关因素包括女性性别(p =.007)、较轻的精神(p =.007)和身体功能障碍(p =.004)、MUS比例降低(p<.10)以及较少的精神共病(p<.10);c统计量 = 0.77。

结论

我们得出结论,抑郁和焦虑比躯体形式障碍更能表征MUS患者。我们的数据表明,通过纳入一大群目前被忽视的DSM躯体形式阴性患者(通常是功能障碍较轻的女性),对DSM-V中的躯体形式障碍进行彻底修订。

相似文献

1
Exploration of DSM-IV criteria in primary care patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
Psychosom Med. 2005 Jan-Feb;67(1):123-9. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000149279.10978.3e.
2
Depression, anxiety, and somatoform disorders: vague or distinct categories in primary care? Results from a large cross-sectional study.
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Sep;67(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
3
Somatization revisited: diagnosis and perceived causes of common mental disorders.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Feb;193(2):85-92. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000152796.07788.b6.
4
A new, empirically established hypochondriasis diagnosis.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;161(9):1680-91. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.9.1680.
6
The relation between anger management style, mood and somatic symptoms in anxiety disorders and somatoform disorders.
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Sep 30;160(3):372-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.003. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
7
Somatization: a spectrum of severity.
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;148(1):34-40. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.7.A34.
8
Prevalence, impact, and prognosis of multisomatoform disorder in primary care: a 5-year follow-up study.
Psychosom Med. 2008 May;70(4):430-4. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31816aa0ee. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
9
The relation between the patient health questionnaire-15 and DSM somatic diagnoses.
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 18;16(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1068-2.

引用本文的文献

2
Briquet syndrome revisited: implications for functional neurological disorder.
Brain Commun. 2020 Sep 23;2(2):fcaa156. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa156. eCollection 2020.
6
The prevalence of bipolar disorder in primary care patients with depression or other psychiatric complaints: a systematic review.
Psychosomatics. 2013 Nov-Dec;54(6):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
7
Current debates over nosology of somatoform disorders.
Ind Psychiatry J. 2012 Jan;21(1):4-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-6748.110939.
10
Somatisation disorder and its associated factors in multiethnic primary care clinic attenders.
Int J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;19(2):165-73. doi: 10.1007/s12529-011-9164-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Building Research Relationships With Managed Care Organizations: Issues and Strategies.
Fam Syst Health. 2003 Jun;21(2):205-214. doi: 10.1037/h0089607.
3
Cognitive behavior therapy for hypochondriasis: a randomized controlled trial.
JAMA. 2004 Mar 24;291(12):1464-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.12.1464.
4
Somatization in Family Practice: Comparing 5 Methods of Classification.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;1(3):85-89. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v01n0305.
5
A method for rating charts to identify and classify patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
Psychother Psychosom. 2004 Jan-Feb;73(1):36-42. doi: 10.1159/000074438.
6
Mild disorders should not be eliminated from the DSM-V.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;60(11):1117-22. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1117.
7
Somatic symptoms in primary care: etiology and outcome.
Psychosomatics. 2003 Nov-Dec;44(6):471-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.44.6.471.
8
Somatoform disorders in DSM-V.
Psychosomatics. 2003 Nov-Dec;44(6):449-51. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.44.6.449.
9
In sickness or in health?
Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):808-10. doi: 10.1126/science.302.5646.808.
10
Medically unexplained physical symptoms, anxiety, and depression: a meta-analytic review.
Psychosom Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;65(4):528-33. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000075977.90337.e7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验