Henningsen Peter, Jakobsen Thorsten, Schiltenwolf Marcus, Weiss Mitchell G
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2005 Feb;193(2):85-92. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000152796.07788.b6.
The assessment of somatoform disorders is complicated by persistent theoretical and practical questions of classification and assessment. Critical rethinking of professional concepts of somatization suggests the value of complementary assessment of patients' illness explanatory models of somatoform and other common mental disorders. We undertook this prospective study to assess medically unexplained somatic symptoms and their patient-perceived causes of illness and to show how patients' explanatory models relate to professional diagnoses of common mental disorders and how they may predict the short-term course of illness. Tertiary care patients (N=186) with prominent somatoform symptoms were evaluated with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, a locally adapted Explanatory Model Interview to elicit patients' illness experience (priority symptoms) and perceived causes, and clinical self-report questionnaires. The self-report questionnaires were administered at baseline and after 6 months. Diagnostic overlap between somatoform, depressive, and anxiety disorders occurred frequently (79.6%). Patients explained pure somatoform disorders mainly with organic causal attributions; they explained pure depressive and/or anxiety disorders mainly with psychosocial perceived causes, and patients in the diagnostic overlap group typically reported mixed causal attributions. In this last group, among patients with similar levels of symptom severity, organic perceived causes were related to a lower physical health sum score on the MOS Short Form, and psychosocial perceived causes were related to less severe depressive symptoms, assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 6 months. Among patients meeting criteria for comorbid somatoform with anxiety and/or depressive disorders, complementary assessment of patient-perceived causes, a key element of illness explanatory models, was related to levels of functional impairment and short-term prognosis. For such patients, causal attributions may be particularly useful to clarify clinically significant features of common mental disorders and thereby contribute to clinical assessment.
躯体形式障碍的评估因分类和评估方面持续存在的理论及实际问题而变得复杂。对躯体化专业概念的批判性反思表明,对患者关于躯体形式障碍及其他常见精神障碍的疾病解释模型进行补充评估具有重要意义。我们开展了这项前瞻性研究,以评估医学上无法解释的躯体症状及其患者所感知的病因,并展示患者的解释模型如何与常见精神障碍的专业诊断相关联,以及它们如何预测疾病的短期病程。对有明显躯体形式症状的三级护理患者(N = 186)进行了评估,采用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的结构化临床访谈、经过本地调整的解释模型访谈以引出患者的疾病体验(优先症状)和感知到的病因,以及临床自我报告问卷。自我报告问卷在基线时和6个月后进行发放。躯体形式障碍、抑郁障碍和焦虑障碍之间的诊断重叠情况频繁出现(79.6%)。患者对单纯的躯体形式障碍主要用器质性因果归因来解释;对单纯的抑郁和/或焦虑障碍主要用心理社会感知到的病因来解释,而诊断重叠组的患者通常报告混合性因果归因。在最后这组患者中,在症状严重程度相似的患者里,器质性感知到的病因与医疗结局研究简表(MOS Short Form)上较低的身体健康总分相关,心理社会感知到的病因与6个月时用医院焦虑抑郁量表评估的较轻抑郁症状相关。在符合躯体形式障碍合并焦虑和/或抑郁障碍标准的患者中,对患者感知到的病因进行补充评估,这是疾病解释模型的一个关键要素,与功能损害水平和短期预后相关。对于这类患者,因果归因可能对阐明常见精神障碍的临床显著特征特别有用,从而有助于临床评估。