文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

严重急性呼吸综合征爆发对急诊科医护人员的心理影响以及他们的应对方式。

The psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on healthcare workers in emergency departments and how they cope.

作者信息

Wong Tai W, Yau Josephine K Y, Chan Cecilia L W, Kwong Rosalie S Y, Ho Samuel M Y, Lau Chor C, Lau Fei L, Lit Chau H

机构信息

Accident and Emergency Department, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;12(1):13-8. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200502000-00005.


DOI:10.1097/00063110-200502000-00005
PMID:15674079
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the present study were to examine the degree and the sources of mental distress and the coping strategies adopted by healthcare workers (HCW) of emergency departments (ED) in Hong Kong during the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to all doctors, nurses and healthcare assistants (HCA) working in the ED of all public hospitals. The overall degree of mental distress was measured by a single-item 11-point Likert scale. The source of distress was measured by an 18-item questionnaire, which was designed based on the experience of clinical psychologist colleagues providing counselling to staff taking care of SARS patients. The Brief Cope questionnaire was used to study coping strategies adopted by staff. RESULTS: A total of 1260 questionnaires were sent out and the response rate was approximately 37%. The mean overall distress level was 6.19 out of a 10-point scale. The mean overall distress levels for doctors, nurses and HCA were 5.91, 6.52 and 5.44, respectively (F(2,420)=6.47, P<0.005). The overall distress level for nurses was significantly higher than for HCA (P<0.005) but not doctors. The overall distress level was highly and significantly correlated with the six sources of distress: vulnerability/loss of control (r=0.68); health of self (r=0.62); spread of virus (r=0.60); health of family and others (r=0.59); changes in work (r=0.46); being isolated (r=0.45). The scores for nurses were significantly higher than for doctors in terms of the six sources of distress (all P values <0.01). HCA were significantly higher than doctors (but not nurses) in worrying about their family's and others' health (P<0.05). In terms of coping strategies, doctors were significantly more likely than nurses and HCA to use planning (P<0.05 and <0.01 respectively); nurses were significantly more likely than doctors to use behavioural disengagement (P<0.01); whereas HCA were significantly more likely than doctors to use self distractions (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SARS had caused a significant level of distress among ED staff. The distress level was highest for nurses, followed by doctors and HCA. The three most important variables that could account for the distress level were loss of control/vulnerability, fear for self-health and spread of the virus. Overall, the more frequently adopted coping strategies were acceptance, active coping, and positive framing.

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查香港严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)爆发期间,急诊科医护人员的心理困扰程度、来源及所采取的应对策略。 方法:向所有公立医院急诊科的医生、护士及医护助理发放问卷。采用单项11点李克特量表测量心理困扰的总体程度。困扰来源通过一份18项问卷进行测量,该问卷基于为照顾SARS患者的工作人员提供咨询的临床心理学家同事的经验设计。使用简易应对方式问卷研究工作人员所采用的应对策略。 结果:共发放问卷1260份,回复率约为37%。在10分制量表中,总体困扰水平的平均值为6.19。医生、护士及医护助理的总体困扰水平平均值分别为5.91、6.52和5.44(F(2,420)=6.47,P<0.005)。护士的总体困扰水平显著高于医护助理(P<0.005),但与医生无显著差异。总体困扰水平与六个困扰来源高度显著相关:易感性/失去控制(r=0.68);自身健康(r=0.62);病毒传播(r=0.60);家人及他人健康(r=0.59);工作变化(r=0.46);被隔离(r=0.45)。在六个困扰来源方面,护士的得分显著高于医生(所有P值<0.01)。在担心家人及他人健康方面,医护助理显著高于医生(但与护士无显著差异)(P<0.05)。在应对策略方面,医生比护士及医护助理更有可能采用计划策略(分别为P<0.05和<0.01);护士比医生更有可能采用行为脱离策略(P<0.01);而医护助理比医生更有可能采用自我分心策略(P<0.05)。 结论:SARS给急诊科工作人员带来了显著程度的困扰。困扰程度最高的是护士,其次是医生和医护助理。导致困扰程度的三个最重要变量是失去控制/易感性、对自身健康的担忧以及病毒传播。总体而言,最常采用的应对策略是接受、积极应对和积极看待。

相似文献

[1]
The psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on healthcare workers in emergency departments and how they cope.

Eur J Emerg Med. 2005-2

[2]
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related psychiatric and posttraumatic morbidities and coping responses in medical staff within a primary health care setting in Singapore.

J Clin Psychiatry. 2004-8

[3]
Coping responses of emergency physicians and nurses to the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak.

Acad Emerg Med. 2005-4

[4]
Psychosocial effects of SARS on hospital staff: survey of a large tertiary care institution.

CMAJ. 2004-3-2

[5]
Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 year after the outbreak.

Can J Psychiatry. 2007-4

[6]
SARS: caring for patients in Hong Kong.

J Clin Nurs. 2005-4

[7]
Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore.

Occup Med (Lond). 2004-5

[8]
Factors associated with the psychological impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on nurses and other hospital workers in Toronto.

Psychosom Med. 2004

[9]
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Hong Kong in 2003: stress and psychological impact among frontline healthcare workers.

Psychol Med. 2004-10

[10]
Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital.

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effectiveness of a Structured Disaster Management Training Program on Nurses' Disaster Readiness for Response to Emergencies and Disasters: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

J Nurs Manag. 2024-7-8

[2]
Depression Risk and Work Hours in Training Physicians Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

medRxiv. 2025-3-17

[3]
Evaluation of the mental health status of intensive care unit healthcare workers at the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic.

Front Public Health. 2024

[4]
A seesaw of equilibrium, midwives' experiences of infection prevention and control guideline adherence: A qualitative descriptive study.

J Infect Prev. 2024-9

[5]
Assessment of Emotions and Stress Coping Mechanisms of Healthcare Workers from the Department of Pediatrics at the Philippine General Hospital a Year after the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Acta Med Philipp. 2024-4-30

[6]
Empathy and Coping Strategies Predict Quality of Life in Japanese Healthcare Professionals.

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024-5-11

[7]
Determinants of burnout in Canadian health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024

[8]
Comparison of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemic-9 and SAVE-6 scales among healthcare workers in Peru.

Front Psychiatry. 2024-5-1

[9]
Prevalence and correlates of mental health problems among different occupations of medical workers during COVID-19 outbreak in China.

Front Public Health. 2024

[10]
The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Coping Behaviors among Nurses in the Intensive Care Unit.

SAGE Open Nurs. 2024-3-27

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索