• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警察使用安全带:他们应该系上吗?

Seat belt use by police: should they click it?

作者信息

von Kuenssberg Jehle Dietrich, Wagner David G, Mayrose James, Hashmi Usman

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, New York 14215, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):119-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000105887.89467.e5.

DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000105887.89467.e5
PMID:15674161
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of mortality in the United States, although seat belts significantly reduce the risk of death. Police officers do not always wear a seat belt. A retrospective study was conducted on all crashes that involved marked police vehicles in the United States and included a death in any of the involved vehicles.

METHODS

For the years 1997 through 2001, crash data were collected and analyzed from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System that included an isolated or multiple vehicle crash with a marked police vehicle and a resulting death in any of the involved vehicles. Motorcycle, aircraft, and undercover police crashes were excluded from this study. Only the occupants of the police vehicle involved in the crash were included in the study. In addition, crashes involving police vehicles where the status of seat belt use by the occupants of the police vehicle was unknown were also excluded.

RESULTS

When the crashes occurred, 59.9% of the officers were responding to nonemergency calls, 79.8% of the occupants were wearing their seat belts, and 79.5% survived. Of the 104 occupants that were not belted, 42 (40.4%) died in the crash, compared with 64 (15.5%) of the 412 belted occupants (risk ratio, 2.6; odds ratio, 3.7).

CONCLUSION

The risk of death was 2.6 times higher for unbelted occupants of police vehicles than for belted occupants in our study population. In addition, seat belt use was not statistically related to emergency versus nonemergency calls.

摘要

背景

在美国,机动车碰撞事故是导致死亡的主要原因之一,尽管安全带能显著降低死亡风险。警察并不总是系安全带。对美国所有涉及有标志警车且事故中任何一辆涉事车辆有人死亡的碰撞事故进行了一项回顾性研究。

方法

收集并分析1997年至2001年期间来自死亡分析报告系统的碰撞数据,这些数据包括涉及有标志警车的单车或多车碰撞事故,且事故中任何一辆涉事车辆有人死亡。本研究排除了摩托车、飞机及便衣警察的碰撞事故。研究仅纳入碰撞事故中涉事警车上的乘客。此外,还排除了那些无法确定警车上乘客安全带使用情况的涉及警车的碰撞事故。

结果

碰撞事故发生时,59.9%的警察在回应非紧急呼叫,79.8%的乘客系着安全带,79.5%的人幸存。在104名未系安全带的乘客中,42人(40.4%)在事故中死亡,而在412名系安全带的乘客中,有64人(15.5%)死亡(风险比为2.6;优势比为3.7)。

结论

在我们的研究人群中,警车中未系安全带的乘客死亡风险比系安全带的乘客高2.6倍。此外,安全带的使用与紧急呼叫和非紧急呼叫在统计学上没有关联。

相似文献

1
Seat belt use by police: should they click it?警察使用安全带:他们应该系上吗?
J Trauma. 2005 Jan;58(1):119-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000105887.89467.e5.
2
How would increasing seat belt use affect the number of killed or seriously injured light vehicle occupants?增加安全带使用会如何影响轻车乘客的死亡或重伤人数?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Mar;88:175-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.022. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
3
Association of seat belt use with death: a comparison of estimates based on data from police and estimates based on data from trained crash investigators.安全带使用与死亡的关联:基于警方数据的估计与基于训练有素的碰撞事故调查人员数据的估计之比较。
Inj Prev. 2002 Dec;8(4):338-41. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.4.338.
4
Factors contributing to serious and fatal injuries in belted rear seat occupants in frontal crashes.导致正面碰撞中安全带后排座椅乘客重伤和死亡的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S84-S91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1601182.
5
Rural and Urban Differences in Passenger-Vehicle-Occupant Deaths and Seat Belt Use Among Adults - United States, 2014.2014年美国城乡成年乘用车乘客死亡及安全带使用情况差异
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Sep 22;66(17):1-13. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6617a1.
6
Thoracic aortic injury in motor vehicle crashes: the effect of impact direction, side of body struck, and seat belt use.机动车碰撞事故中的胸主动脉损伤:撞击方向、身体受撞侧及安全带使用情况的影响
J Trauma. 2004 Sep;57(3):582-90. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000088015.83951.d0.
7
Fatal side impact crash scenarios for rear seat and seat belt-restrained occupants from vulnerable populations.脆弱人群中后排座椅和安全带约束乘客的致命侧面碰撞场景。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup2):S50-S56. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1641598. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Occupant and crash characteristics in thoracic and lumbar spine injuries resulting from motor vehicle collisions.机动车碰撞导致胸腰椎损伤中的驾乘人员与碰撞特征
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
9
Is seat belt use associated with fewer days of lost work after motor vehicle collisions?使用安全带是否与机动车碰撞后减少误工天数相关?
J Trauma. 2004 May;56(5):1009-14. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000124303.68187.c1.
10
Does unbelted safety requirement affect protection for belted occupants?未系安全带的安全要求会影响对系安全带乘客的保护吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 29;18(sup1):S85-S95. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1298096. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Police deaths in New York and London during the twentieth century.20世纪纽约和伦敦的警察死亡情况。
Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):219-24. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010827.