Suppr超能文献

用于通过五级握力测试检测次最大努力的统计方法分析。

Analysis of the statistical methods used to detect submaximal effort with the five-rung grip strength test.

作者信息

Shechtman Orit, Gutierrez Zeida, Kokendofer Emily

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, USA.

出版信息

J Hand Ther. 2005 Jan-Mar;18(1):10-8. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.10.004.

Abstract

Controversy exists in the literature concerning the ability of the five-rung grip test to identify submaximal effort. The purpose of this study was to analyze four methods commonly used to evaluate the shape of the curve generated by maximal versus submaximal efforts. Thirty hand therapy patients performed the five-rung grip test maximally and submaximally with both their injured and uninjured hands. Grip strength scores were recorded at each of the five-rung positions. Next, four methods were used to analyze the data 1) visual analysis, 2) analysis of variance, 3) normalization, and 4) calculation of the standard deviation across the five strength scores. Analysis by all methods demonstrated that there were no differences between the injured hand exerting maximal effort and the uninjured hand exerting submaximal effort. In all four methods, the five-rung grip strength test was unable to distinguish between the injured hand exerting maximal effort and the uninjured hand exerting submaximal effort. The results suggest that the five-rung grip strength test should not be used to determine sincerity of effort in people with hand injuries, and that the shape of the curve generated by the five-rung grip strength test may not be related to level of effort but rather to the amount of force generated by the gripping hand.

摘要

关于五级握力测试识别次最大努力的能力,文献中存在争议。本研究的目的是分析四种常用方法,以评估由最大努力与次最大努力产生的曲线形状。30名手部治疗患者用受伤手和未受伤手分别进行了最大和次最大的五级握力测试。在五级握力位置的每一处记录握力得分。接下来,使用四种方法分析数据:1)视觉分析,2)方差分析,3)归一化,以及4)计算五个力量得分的标准差。所有方法的分析均表明,受伤手施加最大努力与未受伤手施加次最大努力之间没有差异。在所有四种方法中,五级握力测试无法区分受伤手施加最大努力与未受伤手施加次最大努力。结果表明,五级握力测试不应被用于确定手部受伤者努力的诚意,并且五级握力测试产生的曲线形状可能与努力程度无关,而与握力手产生的力量大小有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验