Moayyedi P, Soo S, Deeks J, Delaney B, Harris A, Innes M, Oakes R, Wilson S, Roalfe A, Bennett C, Forman D
Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Division, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD002096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002096.pub2.
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) is the main cause of peptic ulcer disease. The role of H pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia is less clear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of H pylori eradication on dyspepsia symptoms in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were identified through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and keywords, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and with pharmaceutical companies. These searches were updated in October 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: All parallel group randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs to eradicate H pylori with placebo or other drugs known not to eradicate H pylori for patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on individual and global dyspeptic symptom scores, quality of life measures and adverse effects. Dyspepsia outcomes were dichotomised into minimal/resolved versus same/worse symptoms. MAIN RESULTS: Seventeen randomised controlled trials were included in the systematic review. Fourteen trials compared antisecretory dual or triple therapy with placebo antibiotics +/- antisecretory therapy, and evaluated dyspepsia at 3-12 months. Thirteen of these trials gave results as dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3186 patients and there was no significant heterogeneity between the studies. There was a 8% relative risk reduction in the H pylori eradication group (95% CI = 3% to 12%) compared to placebo. The number needed to treat to cure one case of dyspepsia = 18 (95% CI = 12 to 48). A further three trials compared Bismuth based H pylori eradication with an alternative pharmacological agent. These trials were smaller and had a shorter follow-up but suggested H pylori eradication was more effective than either H2 receptor antagonists or sucralfate in treating non-ulcer dyspepsia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: H pylori eradication therapy has a small but statistically significant effect in H pylori positive non-ulcer dyspepsia. An economic model suggests this modest benefit may still be cost-effective but more research is needed.
背景:幽门螺杆菌(H pylori)是消化性溃疡疾病的主要病因。幽门螺杆菌在非溃疡性消化不良中的作用尚不清楚。 目的:确定根除幽门螺杆菌对非溃疡性消化不良患者消化不良症状的影响。 检索策略:通过电子检索Cochrane对照试验注册库(CCTR)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL和SIGLE,使用适当的主题词和关键词,检索已检索文章的参考文献,并与消化不良领域的专家及制药公司联系来确定试验。这些检索在2004年10月进行了更新。 选择标准:所有平行组随机对照试验(RCT),比较用于根除幽门螺杆菌的药物与安慰剂或其他已知不能根除幽门螺杆菌的药物对非溃疡性消化不良患者的疗效。 数据收集与分析:收集个体和总体消化不良症状评分、生活质量指标及不良反应的数据。消化不良结局分为症状轻微/缓解与症状相同/加重。 主要结果:系统评价纳入了17项随机对照试验。14项试验比较了抗分泌双联或三联疗法与安慰剂抗生素加/减抗分泌疗法,并在3至12个月时评估消化不良情况。其中13项试验给出了二分法结局的结果,评估了3186例患者,各研究间无显著异质性。与安慰剂相比,幽门螺杆菌根除组的相对风险降低了8%(95%CI = 3%至12%)。治愈一例消化不良所需治疗人数 = 18(95%CI = 12至48)。另外3项试验比较了基于铋剂的幽门螺杆菌根除疗法与另一种药物。这些试验规模较小,随访时间较短,但提示根除幽门螺杆菌在治疗非溃疡性消化不良方面比H2受体拮抗剂或硫糖铝更有效。 作者结论:根除幽门螺杆菌疗法对幽门螺杆菌阳性的非溃疡性消化不良有小但具有统计学意义的效果。一个经济模型表明这种适度的益处可能仍具有成本效益,但还需要更多研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-1-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-2-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004-10-18
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006-10-18
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2025-1
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018-9-29
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-7-21
World J Gastroenterol. 2014-7-21