Miotto D, Miotto D, Bertolo S, Minante M, Darisi T, Mocellin S, Casara D, Ori C, Foletto M, Rossi C R, Lise M, Nitti D
Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, Italy.
J Chemother. 2004 Nov;16 Suppl 5:44-7.
Stop-flow perfusion (SFP) is a recently implemented locoregional treatment based on the vascular isolation of the tumor bearing body district through a radiointerventistic technique. SFP is currently under investigation as a palliative therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced tumors. This paper reports on the results of our prospective study of limb and pelvic SFP. Thirty-seven patients were treated with SFP. No postoperative deaths occurred. Locoregional and systemic toxicity were observed after 22 and 31 treatments, respectively; complete and partial response after 3 (6%) and 24 (51%) SFPs, respectively. The pharmacokinetic study showed that pelvic SFP was associated with a leakage rate higher than femoral SFP (38% vs 28%). In conclusion, SFP is a feasible procedure. Toxicity and tumor response rates strictly depend upon drug leakage control.
停流灌注(SFP)是一种最近实施的局部区域治疗方法,它通过放射介入技术对携带肿瘤的身体区域进行血管隔离。目前,SFP正在作为局部晚期肿瘤患者的姑息性治疗选择进行研究。本文报告了我们对肢体和盆腔SFP的前瞻性研究结果。37例患者接受了SFP治疗。术后无死亡病例。分别在22次和31次治疗后观察到局部区域和全身毒性;分别在3次(6%)和24次(51%)SFP治疗后出现完全缓解和部分缓解。药代动力学研究表明,盆腔SFP的渗漏率高于股动脉SFP(38%对28%)。总之,SFP是一种可行的方法。毒性和肿瘤反应率严格取决于药物渗漏的控制。