Koren Danny, Norman Doron, Cohen Ayala, Berman Jason, Klein Ehud M
Psychology Department, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;162(2):276-82. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.276.
The aim of the present study was to isolate the unique contribution of physical injury to the subsequent development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Participants were 60 injured soldiers and a comparison group of 40 soldiers (matched by rank, military role, and length of service) who took part in the same combat situations but were not injured. Current and lifetime diagnoses were determined by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. In addition, an extensive battery of self-report questionnaires was given to assess severity of PTSD, anxiety, depression, and dissociative symptoms. The average time that elapsed between the injury and the interview was 15.5 months (SD=7.3).
Ten (16.7%) of the 60 injured survivors but only one (2.5%) of the 40 comparison soldiers met diagnostic criteria for PTSD at the time of the interview (odds ratio=8.6, 95% confidence interval=1.1-394.3). Moreover, wounded participants had significantly higher scores than their noninjured counterparts on all clinical measures. Finally, presence of PTSD was not related to severity of injury or severity of the trauma.
The findings clearly indicate that bodily injury is a major risk factor-rather than a protective one-for PTSD. While supporting the notion that bodily injury contributes to the appraisal of the traumatic event as more dangerous, the data also suggest that this heightened level of perceived threat is not a simple, straightforward function of the severity of injury or of the traumatic event.
本研究的目的是分离身体损伤对创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)后续发展的独特影响。
参与者包括60名受伤士兵和40名士兵组成的对照组(根据军衔、军事角色和服役年限匹配),他们参与了相同的战斗情境但未受伤。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)的结构化临床访谈来确定当前和终生诊断。此外,还发放了一系列广泛的自我报告问卷,以评估PTSD、焦虑、抑郁和解离症状的严重程度。受伤与访谈之间的平均时间为15.5个月(标准差=7.3)。
60名受伤幸存者中有10名(16.7%),但40名对照士兵中只有1名(2.5%)在访谈时符合PTSD诊断标准(优势比=8.6,95%置信区间=1.1-394.3)。此外,受伤参与者在所有临床指标上的得分均显著高于未受伤的同龄人。最后,PTSD的存在与损伤严重程度或创伤严重程度无关。
研究结果清楚地表明,身体损伤是PTSD的主要危险因素,而非保护因素。虽然支持身体损伤会导致将创伤事件评估为更危险的观点,但数据也表明,这种感知到的威胁水平升高并非损伤严重程度或创伤事件严重程度的简单直接函数。