Sahin A, Salman M A, Erden I A, Aypar U
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Oct;21(10):819-23. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504000110.
Minimizing cervical vertebrae motion during endotracheal intubation is important in patients with cervical instability. The aim of this study was to compare upper cervical spine extension during endotracheal intubation using three different techniques.
Duration of intubation and movement of upper cervical vertebrae during endotracheal intubation were compared in 33 patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Patients requiring tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia and neuromuscular blockade were randomly allocated into three groups - direct laryngoscopy, intubating laryngeal mask (LM) airway and fibreoptic laryngoscopy. The procedure was recorded by video-fluoroscopy and analysed with computer-assisted measurements. The maximum movement of the C1/C2 and C2/C3 vertebrae during intubation were obtained. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
We found statistically significant movement between the first and second, but not between the second and third cervical vertebrae. The mean (+/-SD) movement at C1/C2 was 10.2 +/- 7.3 degrees with direct laryngoscopy, 5.0 +/- 6.3 degrees with LM and 1.6 +/- 3.2 degrees with fibreoptic laryngoscopy. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.01) between the direct and fibreoptic laryngoscopy groups. The maximum movement at C2/C3 was 2.2 +/- 10.1 degrees with direct laryngoscopy, 3.5 +/- 5.1 degrees with LM and 0.5 +/- 3.2 degrees with fibreoptic laryngoscopy. Duration of intubation was significantly longer in the intubating LM group (P < 0.001).
We conclude that fibreoptic laryngoscopy is the more suitable intubation technique when cervical spine movement is not desired.
对于颈椎不稳定的患者,在气管插管过程中尽量减少颈椎运动非常重要。本研究的目的是比较使用三种不同技术进行气管插管时上颈椎的伸展情况。
对33例行腰椎椎板切除术的患者在气管插管期间的插管持续时间和上颈椎的运动情况进行比较。需要在全身麻醉和神经肌肉阻滞下进行气管插管的患者被随机分为三组——直接喉镜检查、插管喉罩气道和纤维喉镜检查。该过程通过视频荧光透视记录,并采用计算机辅助测量进行分析。获得插管期间C1/C2和C2/C3椎体的最大运动。使用单因素方差分析以及Bonferroni和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析。
我们发现第一和第二颈椎之间有统计学上的显著运动,但第二和第三颈椎之间没有。C1/C2的平均(±标准差)运动在直接喉镜检查时为10.2±7.3度,在喉罩检查时为5.0±6.3度,在纤维喉镜检查时为1.6±3.2度。直接喉镜检查组和纤维喉镜检查组之间的这种差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.01)。C2/C3的最大运动在直接喉镜检查时为2.2±10.1度,在喉罩检查时为3.5±5.1度,在纤维喉镜检查时为0.5±3.2度。插管喉罩组的插管持续时间明显更长(P < 0.001)。
我们得出结论,当不需要颈椎运动时,纤维喉镜检查是更合适的插管技术。