Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul;32(3):242-248. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000583.
In the evolving research into cervical spine mechanics during airway intervention, new devices are being constantly added to the armamentarium of anesthesiologists. In this study we compared cervical spine movement during orotracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach) assisted flexible bronchoscope or video laryngoscope.
In total, 40 consenting patients without history of abnormalities of cervical spine and planned for elective neuroradiologic interventions in the angiography suite were enrolled in this randomized crossover trial. Every patient was subjected to LMA Fastrach-guided flexible bronchoscopic as well as video laryngoscopy guided intubation. Cervical spine motion at the occipital bone, C1-C5 vertebrae, the occiput-C1, C1-C2, C2-C3 and C4-C5 junctions was investigated using continuous fluoroscopy during intubation. The primary outcome of the study was combined craniocervical motion from occiput to C5 between the 2 intubation techniques.
There was less (62%) combined craniocervical movement from occiput to C5 during the LMA Fastrach-flexible bronchoscopy-guided technique as compared with video laryngoscopy-guided intubation (17.55±14.23 vs. 28.95±11.58 degrees, respectively; P<0.001). The LMA Fastrach flexible bronchoscopy-guided technique also produced significantly less movement as compared to the video laryngoscope at the occiput-C1 (9.75±8.59 vs. 15.00±10.48 degrees; P=0.000) and C1-C2 level (3.95±7.51 vs. 7.53±9.1 degrees; P=0.003).
There was significantly less movement in the craniocervical and upper cervical spine during LMA Fastrach assisted flexible bronchoscopic intubation compared to video laryngoscopic intubation.
在不断发展的气道介入颈椎力学研究中,麻醉医师的武器库中不断加入新的设备。在这项研究中,我们比较了使用插管型喉罩气道(Fastrach LMA)辅助柔性支气管镜或视频喉镜进行经口气管插管时颈椎的运动。
共有 40 名无颈椎异常病史并计划在血管造影室进行神经放射学干预的患者参与了这项随机交叉试验。每位患者均接受了 Fastrach LMA 引导下的柔性支气管镜检查和视频喉镜引导下的插管。在插管过程中使用连续透视法研究枕骨、C1-C5 椎体、枕骨-C1、C1-C2、C2-C3 和 C4-C5 交界处颈椎运动。该研究的主要结果是两种插管技术之间从枕骨到 C5 的颈椎运动。
Fastrach 柔性支气管镜引导技术的颈椎运动幅度(从枕骨至 C5)较视频喉镜引导插管明显减少(62%,分别为 17.55±14.23°和 28.95±11.58°,P<0.001)。Fastrach 柔性支气管镜引导技术与视频喉镜相比,在枕骨-C1(9.75±8.59°和 15.00±10.48°,P=0.000)和 C1-C2 水平(3.95±7.51°和 7.53±9.1°,P=0.003)的运动幅度也明显减小。
Fastrach 辅助柔性支气管镜插管时颈椎和上颈椎运动明显减少。