Durga Padmaja, Sahu Barada Prasad
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Department of Neurosurgery, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2014 Nov-Dec;58(6):684-92. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.147132.
Anaesthesiologists are often involved in the management of patients with cervical spine disorders. Airway management is often implicated in the deterioration of spinal cord function. Most evidence on neurological deterioration resulting from intubation is from case reports which suggest only association, but not causation. Most anaesthesiologists and surgeons probably believe that the risk of spinal cord injury (SCI) during intubation is largely due to mechanical compression produced by movement of the cervical spine. But it is questionable that the small and brief deformations produced during intubation can produce SCI. Difficult intubation, more frequently encountered in patients with cervical spine disorders, is likely to produce greater movement of spine. Several alternative intubation techniques are shown to improve ease and success, and reduce cervical spine movement but their role in limiting SCI is not studied. The current opinion is that most neurological injuries during anaesthesia are the result of prolonged deformation, impaired perfusion of the cord, or both. To prevent further neurological injury to the spinal cord and preserve spinal cord function, minimizing movement during intubation and positioning for surgery are essential. The features that diagnose laryngoscopy induced SCI are myelopathy present on recovery, short period of unconsciousness, autonomic disturbances following laryngoscopy, cranio-cervical junction disease or gross instability below C3. It is difficult to accept or refute the claim that neurological deterioration was induced by intubation. Hence, a record of adequate care at laryngoscopy and also perioperative period are important in the event of later medico-legal proceedings.
麻醉医生经常参与颈椎疾病患者的管理。气道管理常常与脊髓功能恶化有关。关于插管导致神经功能恶化的大多数证据来自病例报告,这些报告仅表明存在关联,但并非因果关系。大多数麻醉医生和外科医生可能认为,插管期间脊髓损伤(SCI)的风险主要是由于颈椎活动产生的机械压迫。但插管期间产生的微小且短暂的变形是否会导致SCI值得怀疑。颈椎疾病患者更常遇到困难插管,这可能会导致脊柱产生更大的活动。几种替代插管技术已被证明可提高操作的 ease 和成功率,并减少颈椎活动,但它们在限制SCI方面的作用尚未得到研究。目前的观点是,麻醉期间的大多数神经损伤是长期变形、脊髓灌注受损或两者共同作用的结果。为防止脊髓进一步受到神经损伤并保留脊髓功能,在插管和手术定位期间尽量减少活动至关重要。诊断喉镜检查引起的SCI的特征包括恢复时出现脊髓病、短暂的无意识状态、喉镜检查后出现自主神经紊乱、颅颈交界疾病或C3以下严重不稳定。很难接受或反驳神经功能恶化是由插管引起的说法。因此,在后期可能发生的医疗法律诉讼中,喉镜检查及围手术期充分护理的记录很重要。 (注:原文中“ease”可能是“efficacy”之类的词有误,暂按原文翻译)