Watts Rosemary J, Pierson Jane, Gardner Heather
Alfred/Deakin Nursing Research Centre, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic. 3125, Australia.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2005 Feb;21(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2004.07.006.
Professional, political and organisational factors have focused attention on the discharge planning process in the Victorian health care sector. Discharge planning for patients, as part of continuity of care, is seen as a key concept in the delivery of nursing care. However, there is no question that discharge planning has emerged as a complex area of practice, and is, perhaps, most complex in the critical care area.
The study reported here is part of a larger thesis exploring critical care nurses' perceptions and understanding of the discharge planning process in the health care system in the state of Victoria, Australia. As part of the survey participants were asked to define discharge planning as it related to the critical care environment in which they worked.
Utilising an exploratory descriptive approach, 502 Victorian critical care nurses were approached to take part in the study. The resultant net total of 218 participants completed the survey, which represented a net response rate of 43.4%. The data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative methodologies.
Three common themes emerged. A significant number of participants did not believe that discharge planning occurred in critical care, and therefore, thought that they could not provide a definition. There was uncertainty as to what the discharge planning process actually referred to in terms of discharge from critical care to the general ward or discharge from the hospital. There was an emphasis on movement of the patient to the general ward, which was considered in three main ways by first, getting the patient ready for transfer; second, ensuring a smooth transition to the ward and third, transfer of the patient to the ward often occurred because the critical care bed was needed for another patient.
The findings presented here suggest at a nursing level, the discharge planning process is not well understood and some degree of mutual exclusivity still remains. There is a need for further education of critical care nurses with regard to the underlying principles of the discharge planning process.
专业、政治和组织因素已将维多利亚州医疗保健部门的出院计划流程列为关注重点。患者出院计划作为连续性护理的一部分,被视为护理服务提供中的一个关键概念。然而,毫无疑问,出院计划已成为一个复杂的实践领域,在重症监护领域可能最为复杂。
本文报道的研究是一项更大规模论文的一部分,该论文探讨了澳大利亚维多利亚州医疗保健系统中重症监护护士对出院计划流程的认知和理解。作为调查的一部分,参与者被要求界定与其工作的重症监护环境相关的出院计划。
采用探索性描述性方法,邀请502名维多利亚州重症监护护士参与研究。最终共有218名参与者完成了调查,净回复率为43.4%。使用定量和定性方法对数据进行分析。
出现了三个共同主题。相当多的参与者认为重症监护中不存在出院计划,因此,他们认为自己无法给出定义。对于从重症监护病房转至普通病房或从医院出院的出院计划流程实际所指内容存在不确定性。重点在于患者转至普通病房,这主要从三个方面来考虑:第一,让患者为转院做好准备;第二,确保顺利过渡到病房;第三,将患者转至病房往往是因为另一名患者需要使用重症监护床位。
此处呈现的研究结果表明,在护理层面,出院计划流程并未得到很好的理解,且仍存在一定程度的相互排斥性。需要对重症监护护士就出院计划流程的基本原则进行进一步培训。