Watts Rosemary, Pierson Jane, Gardner Heather
Epworth/Deakin Nursing Research Centre, Richmond, Vic., Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jan;16(1):194-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01439.x.
This article reports on the current discharge planning beliefs in relation to the co-ordination of the discharge planning process in the critical care environment in the health care system in the state of Victoria, Australia. As there is a paucity of previous studies examining discharge planning in critical care nursing knowledge about the phenomena is consequently limited.
The study reported here is part of a larger study exploring critical care nurses' perceptions and understanding of the discharge planning process in the health care system in the state of Victoria, Australia. While a number of different discharge planning models are reported in the literature there is no agreement on the most effective or the most efficient model.
An exploratory descriptive research design was used for this study.
A total of 502 Victorian critical care nurses were approached to take part in the study. A total of 218 participants completed the survey, which represented a nett response rate of 43.4%. The data from the questionnaire were entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Base 10.0. This allowed calculation of descriptive statistics and statistical analysis using chi-square test for goodness-of-fit.
While just over half the participants reported that the discharge planning process in their unit was co-ordinated by a combination of personnel that included a nurse, just under half the participants believed that this was an appropriate model. Another key finding was of those participants who worked in critical care units using primary nursing, just over half responded that the bedside nurse/primary nurse co-ordinated the discharge planning process while just under half responded that a combination of health care team members, including a nurse, co-ordinated the process. Overall there was little support for the designated discharge planning nurse to co-ordinate the process.
The findings presented here suggest critical care nurses need to examine who has the ultimate responsibility of co-ordinating the critical care patient's discharge plan irrespective of the nursing model employed within the critical care ward. There is the need to ensure that when discharge planning becomes everybody's responsibility it ultimately does not become no-one's responsibility.
If discharge planning practices are to be changed with the introduction of new discharge planning models in the critical care environment then it is important not only to know current practice but also the perceptions of critical care nurses in terms of who they believe should co-ordinate the discharge planning process.
本文报告了澳大利亚维多利亚州医疗保健系统中重症监护环境下,与出院计划流程协调相关的当前出院计划理念。由于以往研究中关于重症监护护理出院计划的研究较少,因此对该现象的了解有限。
此处报告的研究是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究旨在探索澳大利亚维多利亚州医疗保健系统中重症监护护士对出院计划流程的认知和理解。虽然文献中报道了多种不同的出院计划模式,但对于最有效或最高效的模式尚无定论。
本研究采用探索性描述性研究设计。
共邀请了502名维多利亚州的重症监护护士参与研究。共有218名参与者完成了调查,净回复率为43.4%。问卷数据录入社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)10.0版。这使得能够计算描述性统计数据,并使用卡方拟合优度检验进行统计分析。
虽然略多于一半的参与者报告称其所在科室的出院计划流程由包括护士在内的人员共同协调,但不到一半的参与者认为这是一种合适的模式。另一个关键发现是,在采用初级护理的重症监护病房工作的参与者中,略多于一半的人回答床边护士/初级护士协调出院计划流程,而不到一半的人回答包括护士在内的医疗团队成员共同协调该流程。总体而言,很少有人支持指定出院计划护士来协调该流程。
此处呈现的研究结果表明,重症监护护士需要审视谁对协调重症监护患者的出院计划负有最终责任,无论重症监护病房采用何种护理模式。有必要确保当出院计划成为每个人的责任时,最终不会变成无人负责。
如果要在重症监护环境中引入新的出院计划模式来改变出院计划实践,那么不仅了解当前实践,而且了解重症监护护士对他们认为应由谁来协调出院计划流程的看法非常重要。