Bonnemeier Hendrik, Ortak Jasmin, Tölg Ralph, Witt Maren, Schmidt Jörg, Wiegand Uwe K H, Bode Frank, Schunkert Heribert, Richardt Gert
Medizinische Kinik II, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S217-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00013.x.
Beta-adrenergic blockers exert significant antiarrhythmic activity during ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the beneficial effects conferred by alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on ventricular repolarization dynamicity in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI), we compared carvedilol with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomized to metoprolol 200 mg/day versus carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram recorded upon hospital admission. Slopes of the linear QT/RR regression were determined before and after reperfusion. A total of 38 recordings of patients treated with metoprolol and 34 recordings of patients with carvedilol were eligible for analysis of QT/RR slopes. The two study groups were similar with respect to age, gender, TIMI perfusion grades, ventricular function, duration of ischemia, and site and size of infarction. Mean RR- and QT-intervals were similar to the metoprolol and carvedilol groups, before and after PCI. Likewise, there was no significant difference in QT/RR slopes between the metoprolol and carvedilol groups before PCI. In contrast, after PCI, there was a trend toward lower QT/RR slopes in the metoprolol group (from 0.18 +/- 0.07 to 0.17 +/- 0.08), and a significant decrease in QT/RR slopes in the carvedilol group (from 0.17 +/- 0.07 to 0.14 +/- 0.09). In patients undergoing successful direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a significant decrease in QT-RR slopes, suggesting greater cardiac electrical stability.
β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂在缺血和再灌注期间发挥显著的抗心律失常作用。为了进一步探究α-1肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂对心肌梗死(AMI)急性期心室复极动态变化的有益影响,我们在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的背景下,将卡维地洛与美托洛尔进行了比较。在一项前瞻性研究中,100例因AMI接受直接PCI的连续患者被随机分为美托洛尔200毫克/天组和卡维地洛25毫克/天组。在入院时给予研究药物的首剂口服剂量,并记录24小时动态心电图。在再灌注前后测定线性QT/RR回归斜率。共有38例接受美托洛尔治疗患者的记录和34例接受卡维地洛治疗患者的记录符合QT/RR斜率分析的条件。两个研究组在年龄、性别、TIMI灌注分级、心室功能、缺血持续时间以及梗死部位和大小方面相似。PCI前后,美托洛尔组和卡维地洛组的平均RR间期和QT间期相似。同样,PCI前美托洛尔组和卡维地洛组之间的QT/RR斜率无显著差异。相比之下,PCI后,美托洛尔组的QT/RR斜率有降低趋势(从0.18±0.07降至0.17±0.08),而卡维地洛组的QT/RR斜率显著降低(从0.17±0.07降至0.14±0.09)。在因AMI接受成功直接PCI的患者中,与美托洛尔相比,卡维地洛治疗与QT-RR斜率的显著降低相关,提示心脏电稳定性更高。