Bonnemeier Hendrik, Ortak Jasmin, Tölg Ralph, Witt Maren, Schmidt Jörg, Wiegand Uwe K H, Bode Frank, Schunkert Heribert, Richardt Gert
Medizinische Kinik II, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S222-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00014.x.
Beta-adrenergic blockers provide significant cardioprotection during acute ischemia and reperfusion. To further explore the effects of additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade on autonomic modulation in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), carvedilol was compared with metoprolol in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). In a prospective study, 100 consecutive patients (61.1 +/- 11 years; 23 females) undergoing primary PCI for AMI were randomly assigned to metoprolol 200 mg/day vs carvedilol 25 mg/day. The first oral dose of study drug was administered upon hospital admission, and a 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiogram was recorded. A total of 40 recordings of patients assigned to metoprolol and 39 of patients assigned to carvedilol were eligible for analysis of heart rate turbulence. Turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), and turbulence timing were measured after ventricular premature beats (VPBs). The mean value of the 10 preceding RR intervals (mean RR) before VPBs was also measured. There were no significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, TIMI perfusion grades, left ventricular ejection fraction, site and size of infarction, duration of ischemia, and mean 24-hour heart rate between the two groups. Though the mean RR were not significantly different (metoprolol 863.1 +/- 157 ms; carvedilol 839.6 +/- 151 ms), there was a trend toward lower values of TO in the carvedilol group (-0.015 +/- 0.016 vs -0.012 +/- 0.023%; P = NS) and significantly higher values for TS in the metoprolol group (6.96 +/- 5.8 vs 5.6 +/- 4.22; P < 0.05). Turbulence timing was similar in both groups (metoprolol 5.8 +/- 2.4 vs carvedilol 6.1 +/- 2.1). In patients undergoing direct PCI for AMI, treatment with carvedilol, in contrast to metoprolol, was associated with a higher early acceleration and a lower deceleration of heart rate after VPBs, indicating differing effects on baroreceptor response due to additional alpha-1-adrenoceptor blockade. These data offer new insights into effects of a broader antiadrenergic therapy on autonomic reflexes in the acute phase of AMI.
β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂在急性缺血和再灌注期间可提供显著的心脏保护作用。为进一步探讨额外的α-1肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂对急性心肌梗死(AMI)自主神经调节的影响,在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的背景下,将卡维地洛与美托洛尔进行了比较。在一项前瞻性研究中,100例连续接受AMI直接PCI的患者(61.1±11岁;23例女性)被随机分为美托洛尔200 mg/天组和卡维地洛25 mg/天组。研究药物的首剂口服剂量在入院时给予,并记录24小时动态心电图。共40例分配至美托洛尔组和39例分配至卡维地洛组的患者记录符合心率震荡分析条件。在室性早搏(VPB)后测量震荡起始(TO)、震荡斜率(TS)和震荡时间。还测量了VPB前10个RR间期的平均值(平均RR)。两组间的平均年龄、性别分布、TIMI灌注分级、左心室射血分数、梗死部位和大小、缺血持续时间以及24小时平均心率均无显著差异。尽管平均RR无显著差异(美托洛尔863.1±157 ms;卡维地洛839.6±151 ms),但卡维地洛组的TO值有降低趋势(-0.015±0.016对-0.012±0.023%;P=无统计学意义),而美托洛尔组的TS值显著更高(6.96±5.8对5.6±4.22;P<0.05)。两组的震荡时间相似(美托洛尔5.8±2.4对卡维地洛6.1±2.1)。在接受AMI直接PCI的患者中,与美托洛尔相比,卡维地洛治疗与VPB后心率更高的早期加速和更低的减速相关,表明额外的α-1肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂对压力感受器反应有不同影响。这些数据为更广泛的抗肾上腺素能治疗对AMI急性期自主神经反射的影响提供了新的见解。