• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项随机、活性药物对照研究,比较卡维地洛与美托洛尔治疗急性心肌梗死后左心室功能不全患者的效果。

Randomized active-controlled study comparing effects of treatment with carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Mrdovic Igor Bogdan, Savic Lidija Zlatimir, Perunicic Jovan Petar, Asanin Milika Risto, Lasica Ratko Milorad, Jelena Marinkovic Milutin, Matic Mihailo Dragomir, Vasiljevic Zorana Mihailo, Ostojic Miodrag Caslav

机构信息

Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Emergency Hospital, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2007 Jul;154(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.049.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.049
PMID:17584563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol has previously been demonstrated to be beneficial in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, metoprolol has not to date been randomly evaluated in the same patient population. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of treatment with carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with LV dysfunction after AMI.

METHODS

The study enrolled 313 high-risk patients with anterior AMI and LV ejection fraction of <45%, randomly assigned to treatment with carvedilol or metoprolol. Patients were followed-up for a mean period of 13.4 months. The primary end point was time to composite adverse events (t-CAE). The secondary end points were time to composite hard events (t-CHE) and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

No differences were found either in the primary end point of t-CAE or in the secondary end point of t-CHE. A significant benefit was observed in 4 of 8 health-related quality of life domains in the carvedilol group, with fewer carvedilol group patients being withdrawn from therapy in the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with carvedilol, in comparison to that with metoprolol in patients with AMI and LV dysfunction, did not differ significantly in regard to the primary end point of t-CAE or to the secondary end point of t-CHE but resulted in better long-term quality of life and favorable early safety profile.

摘要

背景

此前已证明卡维地洛对急性心肌梗死(AMI)和左心室(LV)功能不全患者有益。然而,美托洛尔迄今尚未在同一患者群体中进行随机评估。本研究的目的是比较卡维地洛与美托洛尔对AMI后LV功能不全患者的治疗效果。

方法

该研究纳入了313例高危前壁AMI且左室射血分数<45%的患者,随机分配接受卡维地洛或美托洛尔治疗。患者平均随访13.4个月。主要终点是复合不良事件发生时间(t-CAE)。次要终点是复合严重事件发生时间(t-CHE)和健康相关生活质量。

结果

在t-CAE主要终点或t-CHE次要终点方面均未发现差异。在卡维地洛组的8个健康相关生活质量领域中有4个观察到显著益处,卡维地洛组在医院退出治疗的患者较少。

结论

与美托洛尔相比,卡维地洛治疗AMI和LV功能不全患者时,在t-CAE主要终点或t-CHE次要终点方面无显著差异,但能带来更好的长期生活质量和良好的早期安全性。

相似文献

1
Randomized active-controlled study comparing effects of treatment with carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.一项随机、活性药物对照研究,比较卡维地洛与美托洛尔治疗急性心肌梗死后左心室功能不全患者的效果。
Am Heart J. 2007 Jul;154(1):116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.049.
2
Carvedilol versus metoprolol in the acute phase of myocardial infarction:卡维地洛与美托洛尔在心肌梗死急性期的比较:
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S222-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00014.x.
3
Carvedilol: use in chronic heart failure.卡维地洛:用于慢性心力衰竭。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2007 Jan;5(1):21-31. doi: 10.1586/14779072.5.1.21.
4
Long-term effects of carvedilol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with persistent left ventricular dysfunction despite chronic metoprolol. The Heart-Muscle Disease Study Group.卡维地洛对尽管长期使用美托洛尔但仍存在持续性左心室功能障碍的特发性扩张型心肌病的长期影响。心脏肌肉疾病研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jun;33(7):1926-34. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00134-5.
5
Landmark study: the Carvedilol Post-Infarct Survival Control in Left Ventricular Dysfunction Study (CAPRICORN).里程碑式研究:卡维地洛治疗左心室功能不全心肌梗死后生存控制研究(CAPRICORN)。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 6;93(9A):13B-6B. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.018.
6
Carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients undergoing direct percutaneous coronary interventions for myocardial infarction: effects on QT dynamicity.卡维地洛与美托洛尔对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心肌梗死患者的影响:对QT动态变化的作用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S217-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00013.x.
7
Effects of metoprolol and carvedilol on cause-specific mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure--COMET.美托洛尔与卡维地洛对慢性心力衰竭患者特定病因死亡率和发病率的影响——COMET研究
Am Heart J. 2005 Feb;149(2):370-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.002.
8
Nebivolol versus Carvedilol or Metoprolol in Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Left Ventricular Dysfunction.奈必洛尔与卡维地洛或美托洛尔用于急性心肌梗死合并左心室功能障碍患者的疗效比较
Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(4):316-22. doi: 10.1159/000446184. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Pharmacokinetic profile of controlled-release carvedilol in patients with left ventricular dysfunction associated with chronic heart failure or after myocardial infarction.控释卡维地洛在伴有慢性心力衰竭或心肌梗死后左心室功能不全患者中的药代动力学特征。
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Oct 2;98(7A):39L-45L. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.018.
10
Carvedilol administration in acute myocardial infarction results in stronger inhibition of early markers of left ventricular remodeling than metoprolol.卡维地洛治疗急性心肌梗死可更强地抑制左室重构的早期标志物,优于美托洛尔。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 15;153(3):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.018. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the effects of various β-blockers on cardiovascular mortality in breast cancer patients.比较各种β受体阻滞剂对乳腺癌患者心血管死亡率的影响。
Cardiooncology. 2024 Mar 26;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40959-024-00217-1.
2
Comparison of Metoprolol Versus Carvedilol After Acute Myocardial Infarction.比较美托洛尔与卡维地洛在急性心肌梗死后的应用。
Am J Cardiol. 2021 May 15;147:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Effect of Low-Dose Nebivolol in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multi-Center Observational Study.
低剂量奈必洛尔对急性心肌梗死患者的影响:一项多中心观察性研究
Chonnam Med J. 2020 Jan;56(1):55-61. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.1.55. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Effects of Bisoprolol Are Comparable with Carvedilol in Secondary Prevention of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.比索洛尔与卡维地洛对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者二级预防的效果相当。
Chonnam Med J. 2018 May;54(2):121-128. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2018.54.2.121. Epub 2018 May 25.
5
Nebivolol versus Carvedilol or Metoprolol in Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Left Ventricular Dysfunction.奈必洛尔与卡维地洛或美托洛尔用于急性心肌梗死合并左心室功能障碍患者的疗效比较
Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(4):316-22. doi: 10.1159/000446184. Epub 2016 May 10.
6
Class effect of beta-blockers in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A nationwide cohort study using an insurance claims database.β受体阻滞剂对ST段抬高型心肌梗死幸存者的类效应:一项使用保险理赔数据库的全国性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2015 Sep 2;5:13692. doi: 10.1038/srep13692.
7
Type of β-blocker use among patients with versus without diabetes after myocardial infarction.心梗后伴或不伴糖尿病患者β受体阻滞剂的使用类型。
Am Heart J. 2014 Sep;168(3):273-279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
8
Secondary prevention of ischaemic cardiac events.缺血性心脏事件的二级预防。
BMJ Clin Evid. 2011 Aug 30;2011:0206.
9
beta-Adrenergic receptor blockers and heart failure risk after myocardial infarction: a critical review.β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂与心肌梗死后的心衰风险:一项批判性综述
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Dec;6(4):220-8. doi: 10.1007/s11897-009-0031-7.