Pépin J-L, Defaye P, Garrigue S, Poezevara Y, Lévy P
Sleep Laboratory, Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble, France.
Eur Respir J. 2005 Feb;25(2):343-7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00132703.
The aim of this study was to assess the ability of overdrive atrial pacing to reduce sleep apnoea severity. A total of 17 unselected patients (12 males; mean+/-SD age 71+/-10 yrs; body mass index 27+/-3 kg x m(-2)) who had received permanent atrial-synchronous ventricular pacemakers for symptomatic bradyarrhythmias and not known to have central or obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) were studied. Using a crossover study design, patients were or were not in pacing mode with atrial overdrive (15 beats x min(-1) faster than mean baseline nocturnal cardiac frequency) for 1 month. Patients were paced only during sleep periods, identified by a specific algorithm included in the pacemaker. Patients underwent three overnight polysomnographic evaluations 1 month apart. The first was performed for baseline evaluation. The patients were then randomly assigned to either 1 night in spontaneous rhythm or to 1 night in pacing mode with atrial overdrive. Two patients refused to continue the study after the first polysomnographic evaluation. OSAS was highly prevalent in this population: 10 of the 15 (67%) patients exhibited an apnoea-hypopnoea index of >30 events x h(-1). The nocturnal spontaneous rhythm was 59+/-7 beats x min(-1) at baseline, compared to 75+/-10 beats x min(-1) with atrial overdrive pacing. The apnoea-hypopnoea index was 46+/-29 events x h(-1) in spontaneous rhythm, compared to 50+/-24 events x h(-1) with atrial overdrive pacing. Overdrive pacing changed none of the respiratory indices, or sleep fragmentation or sleep structure parameters. In conclusion, atrial overdrive pacing has no significant effect on obstructive sleep apnoea.
本研究旨在评估超速心房起搏降低睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度的能力。共研究了17例未经挑选的患者(12例男性;平均±标准差年龄71±10岁;体重指数27±3 kg·m⁻²),这些患者因症状性缓慢性心律失常接受了永久性心房同步心室起搏器治疗,且未知患有中枢性或阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)。采用交叉研究设计,患者接受或不接受心房超速起搏模式(比夜间平均基础心率快15次/分钟)1个月。仅在通过起搏器中包含的特定算法识别出的睡眠期间对患者进行起搏。患者每隔1个月接受3次夜间多导睡眠图评估。第一次用于基线评估。然后将患者随机分配至1晚的自主心律或1晚的心房超速起搏模式。两名患者在第一次多导睡眠图评估后拒绝继续研究。OSAS在该人群中高度流行:15例患者中有10例(67%)呼吸暂停低通气指数>30次/小时。基线时夜间自主心律为59±7次/分钟,相比之下,心房超速起搏时为75±10次/分钟。自主心律时呼吸暂停低通气指数为46±29次/小时,心房超速起搏时为50±24次/小时。超速起搏未改变任何呼吸指标、睡眠片段化或睡眠结构参数。总之,心房超速起搏对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停无显著影响。