Bird G, Senaldi G, Panos M, Rolando N, Alexander G, Vergani D, Williams R
Institute of Liver Studies, King's College, School of Medicine and Dentistry, London.
Gut. 1992 Mar;33(3):307-11. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.3.307.
To investigate the possibility that low complement concentrations in the plasma and ascites of patients with severe liver disease could be secondary to complement consumption, complement activation was studied in 32 patients with severe liver disease, 11 of whom had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). In patients with SBP, plasma C3 and C4 were significantly lower than in uninfected patients (mean values 0.74 v 1.13 g/l, p less than 0.01 and 0.20 v 0.28 g/l, p less than 0.05 respectively). Plasma complement activation via the classical pathway, as shown by C4d/C4, was significantly increased in patients with SBP compared with uninfected patients (37.3 v 22.2, p less than 0.01) as was C3d/C3 (14.0 v 8.11, p less than 0.01), but there was no significant difference in Ba/B between SBP and uninfected patients. Ascitic C3 concentrations were higher in patients without SBP than in infected patients (0.37 v 0.08 g/l, p less than 0.05), as were factor B values (0.11 v 0.03 g/l, p less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in ascitic C4 concentrations in patients with SBP compared with uninfected patients (0.03 v 0.07 g/l). Although consumption of C3, as shown by C3d/C3 in ascites, was increased in infected patients compared with uninfected patients (79.1 v 36.1, p less than 0.05), there was no difference in ascitic complement activation between the groups for either the classical or alternative pathways. In SBP, decreased plasma C3 and C4 are primarily caused by increased activation of the classical pathway and not impaired hepatic synthesis. Activation and consumption of C3 is one factor causing the low ascitic C3 concentrations observed in SBP.
为了研究重症肝病患者血浆和腹水中补体浓度降低可能是补体消耗所致这一可能性,对32例重症肝病患者的补体激活情况进行了研究,其中11例患有自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)。在患有SBP的患者中,血浆C3和C4显著低于未感染患者(平均值分别为0.74 vs 1.13 g/l,p<0.01;0.20 vs 0.28 g/l,p<0.05)。与未感染患者相比,SBP患者中通过经典途径激活的血浆补体,如C4d/C4显著增加(37.3 vs 22.2,p<0.01),C3d/C3也是如此(14.0 vs 8.11,p<0.01),但SBP患者与未感染患者之间Ba/B无显著差异。无SBP患者的腹水C3浓度高于感染患者(0.37 vs 0.08 g/l,p<0.05),B因子值也是如此(0.11 vs 0.03 g/l,p<0.05)。SBP患者与未感染患者的腹水C4浓度无显著差异(0.03 vs 0.07 g/l)。尽管与未感染患者相比,感染患者腹水中C3d/C3所示的C3消耗增加(79.1 vs 36.1,p<0.05),但两组间经典途径或替代途径的腹水补体激活均无差异。在SBP中,血浆C3和C4降低主要是由经典途径激活增加所致,而非肝脏合成受损。C3的激活和消耗是导致SBP中腹水C3浓度降低的一个因素。