Brewin Chris R, Smart Laura
Subdepartment of Clinical Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;36(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2004.11.006.
We sought to show that individual differences in working memory capacity are related to the ability to intentionally suppress personally relevant intrusive thoughts, and that this effect cannot be explained by differences in negative mood. Sixty participants identified their most frequent intrusive thought and then completed a thought suppression task. Better performance on a measure of working memory capacity (OSPAN) was related to having fewer intrusions in the suppression condition but was unrelated to number of intrusions in the expression condition, suggesting a specific association with attempts to inhibit unwanted thoughts. In contrast, a more negative mood was related to having more intrusions in both conditions, suggestive of a more general influence on the accessibility of unwanted thoughts. Working memory capacity was not associated with negative mood or with the frequency of intrusive thoughts reported in everyday life. The findings extend previous results to the domain of personally relevant intrusive thoughts and support the idea that individual differences in the cognitive abilities supporting inhibitory mechanisms are relevant to clinical conditions such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.
我们试图证明,工作记忆容量的个体差异与有意抑制个人相关的侵入性思维的能力有关,并且这种效应不能用消极情绪的差异来解释。60名参与者确定了他们最频繁出现的侵入性思维,然后完成了一项思维抑制任务。在工作记忆容量测量(运算-span广度任务,OSPAN)上表现更好,与在抑制条件下较少出现侵入性思维有关,但与表达条件下的侵入性思维数量无关,这表明与抑制 unwanted 思维的尝试存在特定关联。相比之下,更消极的情绪与在两种条件下都有更多的侵入性思维有关,这表明对 unwanted 思维的可及性有更普遍的影响。工作记忆容量与消极情绪或日常生活中报告的侵入性思维频率无关。这些发现将先前的结果扩展到个人相关侵入性思维领域,并支持这样一种观点,即支持抑制机制的认知能力的个体差异与强迫症和创伤后应激障碍等临床状况相关。