Gophna Uri, Doolittle W Ford, Charlebois Robert L
Genome Atlantic and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
J Bacteriol. 2005 Feb;187(4):1305-16. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.4.1305-1316.2005.
There are many ways to group completed genome sequences in hierarchical patterns (trees) reflecting relationships between their genes. Such groupings help us organize biological information and bear crucially on underlying processes of genome and organismal evolution. Genome trees make use of all comparable genes but can variously weight the contributions of these genes according to similarity, congruent patterns of similarity, or prevalence among genomes. Here we explore such possible weighting strategies, in an analysis of 142 prokaryotic and 5 eukaryotic genomes. We demonstrate that alternate weighting strategies have different advantages, and we propose that each may have its specific uses in systematic or evolutionary biology. Comparisons of results obtained with different methods can provide further clues to major events and processes in genome evolution.
有多种方法可以将已完成的基因组序列按照反映其基因间关系的层次模式(树状结构)进行分组。这样的分组有助于我们整理生物信息,并对基因组和生物体进化的潜在过程至关重要。基因组树利用了所有可比较的基因,但可以根据相似性、相似性的一致模式或在基因组中的普遍性,以不同方式权衡这些基因的贡献。在这里,我们在对142个原核生物和5个真核生物基因组的分析中探索了这种可能的加权策略。我们证明了不同的加权策略有不同的优势,并提出每种策略在系统生物学或进化生物学中可能都有其特定用途。用不同方法获得的结果比较可以为基因组进化中的重大事件和过程提供进一步线索。