Knowlton Amy, Hua Wei, Latkin Carl
Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2004 Dec;8(4):357-63. doi: 10.1007/s10461-004-7320-7.
The study compared social support networks of HIV seropositive versus seronegative injection drug users (IDUs). Participants were 635 low income African Americans; 47% were HIV seropositive (of whom 17% had AIDS), 45% female, and 45% current drug users. A social network methodology elicited structural, functional, and relational network components. After controlling for confounders, HIV seropositive compared with HIV seronegative IDUs had larger support networks, including more females, kin and sources of instrumental assistance, and marginally more sources of emotional support, though they were less likely to have a sex partner. There was no difference between HIV status and number of active drug users in support networks. Results suggest that HIV seropositive IDUs had mobilized a range of network support but that they also relied on drug using social influences. Findings may have implications to the development of integrated HIV prevention and care intervention that builds on HIV seropositives' natural support structures.
该研究比较了艾滋病毒血清阳性与血清阴性注射吸毒者(IDU)的社会支持网络。参与者为635名低收入非裔美国人;47%为艾滋病毒血清阳性(其中17%患有艾滋病),45%为女性,45%为当前吸毒者。一种社会网络方法得出了结构、功能和关系网络成分。在控制了混杂因素后,与艾滋病毒血清阴性的注射吸毒者相比,艾滋病毒血清阳性的注射吸毒者拥有更大的支持网络,包括更多女性、亲属和工具性援助来源,以及略多的情感支持来源,尽管他们有性伴侣的可能性较小。在支持网络中,艾滋病毒感染状况与活跃吸毒者数量之间没有差异。结果表明,艾滋病毒血清阳性的注射吸毒者动员了一系列网络支持,但他们也依赖吸毒的社会影响。研究结果可能对基于艾滋病毒血清阳性者自然支持结构的综合艾滋病毒预防和护理干预措施的制定有影响。