Suppr超能文献

腹部造影检查报告的顺序会妨碍检索需求的满足吗?

Can order of report prevent satisfaction of search in abdominal contrast studies?

作者信息

Berbaum Kevin S, Franken E A, Dorfman Donald D, Caldwell Robert T, Lu Charles H

机构信息

Department of Radiology, 3170 Medical Laboratories, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2005 Jan;12(1):74-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.007.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

A previous receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study showed a systematic shift in decision thresholds for detecting plain film abnormalities on contrast examinations rather than plain radiographs. A previous eye-position study showed that this shift was based on a relative visual neglect of plain film regions on the contrast studies. We now determine whether an intervention that changes visual search can reduce this search-based satisfaction of search effect in contrast studies of the abdomen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors measured detection of 23 plain film abnormalities in 44 patients who had plain film and contrast examinations. In 2 experiments, each plain-film and contrast study was examined independently in different sessions with observers providing a confidence rating of abnormality for each interpretation. There were 13 observers in the first experiment and 10 in the second experiment. The intervention required that for the contrast studies, observers first report abnormalities in the noncontrast region of the radiograph before reporting contrast findings. ROC curve areas for each observer in each treatment condition were estimated by using a proper ROC model. The analysis focused on changes in decision thresholds among the treatment conditions.

RESULTS

The SOS effect on decision thresholds in abdominal contrast studies was replicated. Although reduced, the shift in decision thresholds in detecting plain film abnormalities on contrast examinations remained when observers were required to report those abnormalities before contrast findings.

CONCLUSION

Reporting plain film abnormalities before reporting abnormalities demonstrated by contrast reduced somewhat the satisfaction of search effect on decision thresholds produced by a visual neglect of noncontrast regions on contrast examinations. This suggests that interventions that direct visual search do not offer protection against satisfaction of search effects that are based on faulty visual search.

摘要

原理与目的

先前的一项接受者操作特征(ROC)研究表明,在对比检查而非平片上检测平片异常时,决策阈值存在系统性偏移。先前的一项眼位研究表明,这种偏移是基于对比研究中对平片区域的相对视觉忽视。我们现在确定一种改变视觉搜索的干预措施是否能减少腹部对比研究中基于搜索的满足搜索效应。

材料与方法

作者测量了44例接受平片和对比检查的患者中23种平片异常的检测情况。在2个实验中,每次平片和对比研究在不同时段独立进行检查,观察者对每次解读给出异常的置信度评分。第一个实验有13名观察者,第二个实验有10名观察者。干预措施要求在对比研究中,观察者在报告对比结果之前先报告X线片中非对比区域的异常。使用适当的ROC模型估计每个观察者在每种治疗条件下的ROC曲线面积。分析重点在于治疗条件之间决策阈值的变化。

结果

腹部对比研究中决策阈值的满足搜索效应得到了重复验证。尽管有所降低,但当要求观察者在报告对比结果之前报告平片异常时,在对比检查中检测平片异常时决策阈值的偏移仍然存在。

结论

在报告对比显示的异常之前报告平片异常,在一定程度上降低了因对比检查中对非对比区域的视觉忽视而产生的决策阈值的满足搜索效应。这表明引导视觉搜索的干预措施并不能防止基于错误视觉搜索的满足搜索效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验