Berbaum K S, Franken E A, Dorfman D D, Miller E M, Krupinski E A, Kreinbring K, Caldwell R T, Lu C H
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Acad Radiol. 1996 Oct;3(10):815-26. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(96)80271-6.
Extraintestinal abnormalities visible without contrast material on abdominal radiographs are reported less frequently when contrast examinations are performed. Gaze dwell time was used to determine whether this difference is due to failure by observers to scan plain-film regions of contrast studies or discounting of plain-film abnormalities that were actually scanned.
Patients were included whose contrast studies had elicited the largest reductions in positive responses compared with their plain-film studies in a previous detection experiment. Gaze of 10 radiologists was studied.
Significantly less time was spent gazing at non-contrast regions of contrast examinations than at the corresponding regions of radiographs. Errors with radiographs were based primarily on failures of recognition and decision making, whereas errors with contrast studies were based primarily on faulty scanning.
Satisfaction of search errors on contrast examinations are caused by reduction in scanning of noncontrast regions.
在进行造影检查时,腹部X光片上无需造影剂即可看到的肠外异常情况的报告频率较低。注视停留时间被用来确定这种差异是否是由于观察者未能扫描造影研究的平片区域,或者是否对实际扫描的平片异常情况不予考虑。
纳入在先前的检测实验中,造影研究与平片研究相比阳性反应减少最多的患者。研究了10位放射科医生的注视情况。
与X光片的相应区域相比,注视造影检查非造影区域的时间明显更少。X光片的错误主要基于识别和决策失误,而造影研究的错误主要基于扫描错误。
造影检查中搜索错误的原因是对非造影区域扫描的减少。