• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety in the operating theatre - Part 2: human error and organisational failure.手术室安全 - 第2部分:人为失误与组织失效
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):56-60.
2
Critical incident monitoring in anaesthesia.麻醉中的危急事件监测
Med J Malaysia. 2006 Dec;61(5):577-85.
3
Human error and crew resource management failures in Naval aviation mishaps: a review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990-96.海军航空事故中的人为失误与机组资源管理故障:对美国海军安全中心1990 - 1996年数据的回顾
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Dec;70(12):1147-51.
4
Understanding adverse events: human factors.理解不良事件:人为因素
Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;4(2):80-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.4.2.80.
5
Errors in the operating theatre--how to spot and stop them.手术室差错——如何发现和防止。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010 Jan;15 Suppl 1:48-51. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.09s105.
6
Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia.了解人为因素对澳大利亚铁路事故和事件的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Sep;40(5):1750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
7
Normal accidents: human error and medical equipment design.《正常事故:人为错误与医疗设备设计》
Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5(3):254-7.
8
Operating room of the future.未来手术室。
Russ Coiles Health Trends. 2003 Jun;15(8):1, 4-6, 8.
9
Distraction in the urology operating theatre.泌尿外科手术室中的干扰因素。
BJU Int. 2007 Mar;99(3):493-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06573.x. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
10
Rules, safety and the narrativisation of identity: a hospital operating theatre case study.规则、安全与身份叙事:一个医院手术室的案例研究
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Mar;28(2):178-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00487.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Multidisciplinary In Situ Simulation-Based Team Training in the Operating Room on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review.基于多学科原位模拟的手术室团队培训对患者结局的影响:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 7;17(7):e87430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87430. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Preventive strategies for reducing intraoperative awareness due to errors in anesthetic drug delivery systems: a narrative review.减少麻醉药物输送系统错误导致术中知晓的预防策略:一项叙述性综述
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1566185. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1566185. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring the impact of interaction dynamics and professional capacity and development on cognitive medical errors: a multiple-case study of healthcare professionals in Jordan.探索互动动态以及专业能力与发展对认知性医疗差错的影响:约旦医疗保健专业人员的多案例研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07082-1.
4
Common Mistakes in Managing Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.炎症性肠病患者管理中的常见误区
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 14;13(16):4795. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164795.
5
Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system.麻醉相关危急气道事件和险兆事件:对一个危急事件报告系统的定性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Aug;133(2):371-379. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.052. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
6
Human error and violation of rules in industrial safety: A systematic literature review.人为失误与工业安全违规:系统文献回顾。
Work. 2024;79(3):1237-1253. doi: 10.3233/WOR-230186.
7
A Modular Cataract Surgery Training Model Incorporating Human Factors and a Pedagogical Theory.一种融合人为因素和教学理论的模块化白内障手术培训模型
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;18:1171-1180. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S451594. eCollection 2024.
8
Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines.新生儿和婴儿的气道管理:欧洲麻醉学会和重症监护学会与英国麻醉学会联合指南。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2024 Jan 1;41(1):3-23. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001928. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
9
Deep Learning-Based System for Preoperative Safety Management in Cataract Surgery.基于深度学习的白内障手术术前安全管理系统
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 14;11(18):5397. doi: 10.3390/jcm11185397.
10
Human errors and their prevention in healthcare.医疗保健中的人为错误及其预防
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul-Sep;37(3):328-335. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_364_19. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. System failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):684-95. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100535.
2
The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Human failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):678-83. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100534.
3
The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. The "wrong drug" problem in anaesthesia: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):596-601. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100517.
4
Effects of information feedback and pulse oximetry on the incidence of anesthesia complications.
Anesthesiology. 1987 Nov;67(5):686-94. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198711000-00012.
5
Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care.结果对医生关于护理适宜性判断的影响。
JAMA. 1991 Apr 17;265(15):1957-60.
6
Are you getting the message? A look at the communication between the Department of Health, manufacturers and anaesthetists.
Anaesthesia. 1991 Oct;46(10):845-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09598.x.
7
Reported significant observations during anaesthesia: a prospective analysis over an 18-month period.
Br J Anaesth. 1992 Jan;68(1):13-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/68.1.13.
8
Accident analysis of large-scale technological disasters applied to an anaesthetic complication.应用于麻醉并发症的大规模技术灾难事故分析
Can J Anaesth. 1992 Feb;39(2):118-22. doi: 10.1007/BF03008640.
9
Anaesthetic machine checking practices. A survey.
Anaesthesia. 1992 Oct;47(10):866-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03151.x.

手术室安全 - 第2部分:人为失误与组织失效

Safety in the operating theatre - Part 2: human error and organisational failure.

作者信息

Reason J

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):56-60.

PMID:15692005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743973/
Abstract

Over the past decade, anaesthetists and human factors specialists have worked together to find ways of minimising the human contribution to anaesthetic mishaps. As in the functionally similar fields of aviation, process control and military operations, it is found that errors are not confined to those at the "sharp end". In common with other complex and well defended technologies, anaesthetic accidents usually result from the often unforeseeable combination of human and organisational failures in the presence of some weakness or gap in the system's many barriers and safeguards. Psychological factors such as inattention, distraction and forgetfulness are the last and often the least manageable aspects of the accident sequence. Whereas individual unsafe acts are hard to predict and control, the organisational and contextual factors that give rise to them are present before the occurrence of an incident or accident. As such, they are prime candidates for treatment. Errors at the sharp end are symptomatic of both human fallibility and underlying organisational failings. Fallibility is here to stay. Organisational and local problems, in contrast, are both diagnosable and manageable.

摘要

在过去十年里,麻醉师和人为因素专家共同努力,寻找方法将人为因素对麻醉事故的影响降至最低。正如在功能类似的航空、过程控制和军事行动领域一样,人们发现错误并不局限于“一线人员”。与其他复杂且防护完善的技术一样,麻醉事故通常是由于在系统众多屏障和安全措施存在某些薄弱环节或漏洞的情况下,人为失误和组织失误往往不可预见地结合在一起导致的。诸如注意力不集中、分心和健忘等心理因素是事故发生过程的最后一环,且往往是最难控制的方面。虽然个别不安全行为难以预测和控制,但导致这些行为的组织和环境因素在事件或事故发生之前就已存在。因此,它们是首要的处理对象。一线的失误是人为易犯错性和潜在组织缺陷的症状。易犯错性将一直存在。相比之下,组织和局部问题都是可诊断和可管理的。