癌症等待时间审核的系统评价
A systematic review of cancer waiting time audits.
作者信息
Lewis R, Collins R, Flynn A, Dean M Emmans, Myers L, Wilson P, Eastwood A
机构信息
Department of General Practice, North Wales Section, Cardiff University, UK.
出版信息
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):62-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.013359.
Abstract
A summary of a systematic review of clinical audits of cancer referrals in England and Wales.
摘要
英格兰和威尔士癌症转诊临床审计系统评价综述
相似文献
1
A systematic review of cancer waiting time audits.癌症等待时间审核的系统评价
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):62-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.013359.
2
Clinical governance in primary care: a literature review.基层医疗中的临床治理：一项文献综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Sep;13(6):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00949.x.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Provision, uptake and cost of cardiac rehabilitation programmes: improving services to under-represented groups.心脏康复计划的提供、接受情况及成本：改善对代表性不足群体的服务
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(41):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-152. doi: 10.3310/hta8410.
5
Measuring and reducing waiting times: a cross-national comparison of strategies.测量与减少等待时间：策略的跨国比较
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1078-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1078.
6
Assessing the effectiveness of quality assurance.评估质量保证的有效性。
Health Manpow Manage. 1993;19(3):12-7. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000001614.
7
Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen.入学听力筛查的当前实践、准确性、有效性及成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Aug;11(32):1-168, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11320.
8
Time from Diagnostic Suspicion to In-Person Evaluation in Skin Cancer Using Teledermatology.使用远程皮肤病学对皮肤癌进行诊断怀疑至亲自评估的时间。
Telemed J E Health. 2025 Feb;31(2):234-241. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0660. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
9
A deathly silence: why has the number of people found decomposed in England and Wales been rising?死寂沉沉：为何在英格兰和威尔士被发现的腐烂尸体人数不断上升？
J R Soc Med. 2024 May;117(5):172-181. doi: 10.1177/01410768231209001. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
10
Cancer waiting times: the clinical perspective.癌症等待时间：临床视角
Scott Med J. 2008 Aug;53(3):2-4.
引用本文的文献
1
The role of primary care in early detection and follow-up of cancer.初级保健在癌症的早期发现和随访中的作用。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan;11(1):38-48. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.212. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
2
Variation in use of the 2-week referral pathway for suspected cancer: a cross-sectional analysis.两周转诊途径在疑似癌症患者中的应用差异：一项横断面分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Sep;62(602):e590-7. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X654551.
3
Interventions to reduce primary care delay in cancer referral: a systematic review.干预措施以减少癌症转诊的初级保健延误：系统评价。
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Dec;61(593):e821-35. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X613160.
4
An audit of urology two-week wait referrals in a large teaching hospital in England.对英国一家大型教学医院泌尿外科两周等待转诊情况的审计。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 May;91(4):310-2. doi: 10.1308/003588409X391767. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
5
[Paradoxes in referral from primary to specialist care].[初级保健转诊至专科护理中的悖论]
Aten Primaria. 2008 May;40(5):253-5. doi: 10.1157/13120018.
6
Urgent GP referrals for suspected lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer.因疑似肺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌和卵巢癌而由全科医生进行的紧急转诊。
Br J Gen Pract. 2006 May;56(526):355-62.
7
The effects of the Two-Week Rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: a systematic literature review.“两周规则”对英国国家医疗服务体系（NHS）结直肠癌诊断服务的影响：一项系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 3;6:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-43.
本文引用的文献
1
Measuring the quality of clinical audit projects.衡量临床审计项目的质量。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2000 Nov;6(4):359-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00254.x.
2
Users' guides to the medical literature. XI. How to use an article about a clinical utilization review. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南。十一、如何使用一篇关于临床应用评估的文章。循证医学工作组
JAMA. 1996 May 8;275(18):1435-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.18.1435.
Zotero 插件