Anderson Gail D
Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1):19-29. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.19.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed 300 new drug applications between 1995 and 2000. Of the 163 that included a sex analysis, 11 drugs showed a >40% difference in pharmacokinetics between males and females, which was listed on the product label, yet no dosing recommendations were made based on sex. Female sex has been shown to be a risk factor for clinically relevant adverse drug reactions. Would simply dosing females based on their different pharmacokinetics decrease the incidence of adverse events? The answer is not known. Sex-dependent pharmacodynamic effects have been identified. The role of pharmacokinetics vs. pharmacodynamics is unclear, as is the impact of pharmacogenetics on both. This review highlights a few specific examples in each area in which sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are important and provides recommendations for additional needed research.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)在1995年至2000年间审查了300份新药申请。在包含性别分析的163份申请中,有11种药物在男性和女性之间的药代动力学差异>40%,这已列在产品标签上,但未根据性别给出给药建议。女性已被证明是临床相关药物不良反应的一个风险因素。仅根据女性不同的药代动力学来给药会降低不良事件的发生率吗?答案尚不清楚。已确定了性别依赖性药效学效应。药代动力学与药效学的作用尚不清楚,药物遗传学对两者的影响也不清楚。本综述重点介绍了每个领域中一些药代动力学和药效学性别差异很重要的具体例子,并为额外所需的研究提供了建议。