Suppr超能文献

使用解剖M型超声心动图测定窦性心律患者的左心耳功能。

The use of anatomic M-mode echocardiography to determine the left atrial appendage functions in patients with sinus rhythm.

作者信息

Gurlertop Yekta, Yilmaz Mustafa, Acikel Mahmut, Bozkurt Engin, Erol M Kemal, Gundogdu Fuat, Senocak Huseyin, Atesal Sebahattin

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2005 Feb;22(2):99-103. doi: 10.1111/j.0742-2822.2005.03131.x.

Abstract

Left atrial appendage (LAA) contractile dysfunction is associated with thrombus formation and systemic embolism. LAA function is determined by its flow velocities and fractional area change. This study was performed in order to determine the LAA functions with the anatomic M-mode echocardiography (AMME). Our study comprised 74 patients who had sinus rhythm and underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for various reasons. LAA fractional change (LAAFAC) was measured by manual planimetry in a transverse basal short-axis approach and LAA emptying and filling velocities also were measured. The AMME values were determined by an M-mode cross section from a cursor placed beneath the orifice of the LAA in transverse basal short-axis imaging. From these values LAA fractional shortening (LAAFS) and ejection fraction (LAAEF) were calculated. LAAEF was calculated by the Teicholz method. The comparisons were conducted, and no correlations between the LAA late filling and the anatomic M-mode values were found (for LAAFS r = 0.18; P > 0.05 and for LAAEF r = 0.19; P > 0.05). There were significant but poor correlations among the LAA late emptying with the anatomic M-mode measurements (for LAAFS r = 0.26; P < 0.05 and for LAAEF r = 0.30; P < 0.01), whereas, there were significant and good correlations between the LAAFAC and the anatomic M-mode values (for LAAFS r = 0.75; P < 0.01 and for LAAEF r = 0.78; P < 0.01). There were significant differences between the valvular heart disease group and the normal group, and between the valvular heart disease group and the ASD group (for LAAFAC P < 0.01, for LAAEF P < 0.01, for LAAFS P < 0.01). There was no difference between the normal group and the ASD group. Our study showed that the LAAEF and LAAFS in patients with sinus rhythm obtained via anatomical M-mode echocardiography is a new method, which can be used instead of left atrial appendage area change.

摘要

左心耳(LAA)收缩功能障碍与血栓形成及系统性栓塞相关。LAA功能由其血流速度和面积变化分数决定。本研究旨在通过解剖M型超声心动图(AMME)测定LAA功能。我们的研究纳入了74例窦性心律且因各种原因接受经食管超声心动图(TEE)检查的患者。采用横基底部短轴切面手动面积测量法测量LAA面积变化分数(LAAFAC),并测量LAA排空和充盈速度。AMME值通过在横基底部短轴成像中置于LAA口下方的光标获取的M型横截面确定。根据这些值计算LAA缩短分数(LAAFS)和射血分数(LAAEF)。LAAEF采用Teicholz法计算。进行了比较,未发现LAA晚期充盈与解剖M型值之间存在相关性(LAAFS:r = 0.18;P > 0.05;LAAEF:r = 0.19;P > 0.05)。LAA晚期排空与解剖M型测量值之间存在显著但较弱的相关性(LAAFS:r = 0.26;P < 0.05;LAAEF:r = 0.30;P < 0.01),而LAAFAC与解剖M型值之间存在显著且良好的相关性(LAAFS:r = 0.75;P < 0.01;LAAEF:r = 0.78;P < 0.01)。瓣膜性心脏病组与正常组之间以及瓣膜性心脏病组与房间隔缺损(ASD)组之间存在显著差异(LAAFAC:P < 0.01;LAAEF:P < 0.01;LAAFS:P < 0.01)。正常组与ASD组之间无差异。我们的研究表明,通过解剖M型超声心动图获得的窦性心律患者的LAAEF和LAAFS是一种新方法,可用于替代左心耳面积变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验