Suppr超能文献

使用结膜过敏原激发模型比较0.1%奥洛他定滴眼液与0.05%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液的疗效

Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.

作者信息

Abelson Mark B, Greiner Jack V

机构信息

Ophthalmic Research Associates, North Andover, MA 01845, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Dec;20(12):1953-8. doi: 10.1185/030079904X5724.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of olopatadine and levocabastine in reducing ocular allergic itching and vascular hyperemia (redness) induced by conjunctival allergen challenge.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was a randomized, double-masked, contralateral study using the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) model. At Visit 1, subjects with a positive allergen skin test and a history of allergic conjunctivitis were administered increasing concentrations of allergen until at least a moderate grade 2 ocular itching and conjunctival redness response was obtained in both eyes. Allergic signs were graded on standardized 0-4 scales. Subjects who reacted positively were re-challenged at Visit 2 with the pre-determined concentration of allergen. Subjects who again responded with at least a grade 2 bilateral ocular itching and conjunctival redness score at Visit 2 were eligible for drug evaluation. At Visit 3, subjects received olopatadine in one eye and levocabastine in the contralateral eye according to a computer-generated randomization scheme generated prior to commencement of the study. Ocular discomfort was then graded in both eyes. Subjects were bilaterally challenged with the predetermined concentration of allergen 27 min after topical drug administration, such that the first post-challenge assessment was made 30 min post-drug instillation. Allergic signs and symptoms were evaluated at 3 min, 10 min, and 20 min postchallenge and safety and efficacy analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight subjects received study drug and were included in the safety and efficacy analyses. Ocular itching scores for olopatadine were significantly lower than levocabastine at 3 min and 10 min post-challenge (p < 0.001). Ocular redness scores for olopatadine were significantly lower than levocabastine at all time points post-challenge (p < 0.0001). Of all subjects, 4.41% reported ocular discomfort in the olopatadine eye and 26.5% in the levocabastine treated eye.

CONCLUSION

Olopatadine treated eyes had significantly less itching and redness than levocabastine treated eyes after conjunctival allergen challenge. Olopatadine was also associated with less discomfort upon instillation than levocabastine.

摘要

目的

比较奥洛他定和左卡巴斯汀在减轻结膜过敏原激发试验诱导的眼部过敏性瘙痒和血管充血(发红)方面的疗效。

研究设计与方法

本研究采用结膜过敏原激发试验(CAC)模型进行随机、双盲、对侧研究。在第1次就诊时,对过敏原皮肤试验呈阳性且有过敏性结膜炎病史的受试者给予递增浓度的过敏原,直至双眼至少出现中度2级眼部瘙痒和结膜充血反应。过敏体征按照标准化的0 - 4级评分。在第2次就诊时,对反应阳性的受试者用预先确定浓度的过敏原再次进行激发试验。在第2次就诊时再次出现至少2级双侧眼部瘙痒和结膜充血评分的受试者有资格进行药物评估。在第3次就诊时,根据研究开始前生成的计算机随机化方案,受试者一只眼接受奥洛他定,对侧眼接受左卡巴斯汀。然后对双眼的眼部不适进行评分。在局部用药27分钟后,用预先确定浓度的过敏原对受试者双眼进行激发试验,以便在滴药后30分钟进行首次激发后评估。在激发试验后3分钟、10分钟和20分钟评估过敏体征和症状,并进行安全性和疗效分析。

结果

68名受试者接受了研究药物治疗并纳入安全性和疗效分析。在激发试验后3分钟和10分钟,奥洛他定组的眼部瘙痒评分显著低于左卡巴斯汀组(p < 0.001)。在激发试验后的所有时间点,奥洛他定组的眼部充血评分显著低于左卡巴斯汀组(p < 0.0001)。在所有受试者中,4.41%报告奥洛他定治疗眼有眼部不适,而左卡巴斯汀治疗眼为26.5%。

结论

结膜过敏原激发试验后,奥洛他定治疗的眼睛比左卡巴斯汀治疗的眼睛瘙痒和发红明显减轻。与左卡巴斯汀相比,奥洛他定滴眼时引起的不适也较少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验