Yassen Ashraf, Olofsen Erik, Dahan Albert, Danhof Meindert
Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Division of Pharmacology, Gorlaeus Laboratories, The Netherlands.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Jun;313(3):1136-49. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.082560. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
The objective of this investigation was to characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation of buprenorphine and fentanyl for the antinociceptive effect in rats. Data on the time course of the antinociceptive effect following intravenous administration of buprenorphine or fentanyl was analyzed in conjunction with plasma concentrations by nonlinear mixed-effects analysis. For fentanyl, the pharmacokinetics was described on the basis of a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. For buprenorphine, a three-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the concentration time course. To explain time dependencies in pharmacodynamics of buprenorphine and fentanyl, a combined effect compartment/receptor binding model was applied. A log logistic probability distribution model is proposed to account for censored tail-flick latencies. The model converged, yielding precise estimates of the parameters characterizing hysteresis. The results show that onset and offset of the antinociceptive effect of both buprenorphine and fentanyl is mainly determined by biophase distribution. The k(eo) was 0.024 min(-1) [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.018-0.030 min(-1)] and 0.123 min(-1) (95% CI: 0.095-0.151 min(-1)) for buprenorphine and fentanyl, respectively. On the other hand, part of the hysteresis in the buprenorphine pharmacodynamics could be explained by slow receptor association/dissociation kinetics. The k(off) was 0.073 min(-1) (95% CI: 0.042-0.104 min(-1)) and k(on) was 0.023 ml/ng/min (95% CI: 0.013-0.033 ml/ng/min). Fentanyl binds instantaneously to the OP3 receptor because no reasonable values for k(on) and k(off) were obtained with the dynamical receptor model. In contrast to earlier reports in the literature, the findings of this study show that the rate-limiting step in the onset and offset of buprenorphine's antinociceptive effect is distribution to the brain.
本研究的目的是表征丁丙诺啡和芬太尼对大鼠抗伤害感受作用的药代动力学/药效学相关性。通过非线性混合效应分析,结合血浆浓度分析静脉注射丁丙诺啡或芬太尼后抗伤害感受作用的时间进程数据。对于芬太尼,基于二室药代动力学模型描述其药代动力学。对于丁丙诺啡,三室药代动力学模型最能描述其浓度-时间进程。为了解释丁丙诺啡和芬太尼药效学中的时间依赖性,应用了联合效应室/受体结合模型。提出了对数逻辑概率分布模型来解释截尾甩尾潜伏期。模型收敛,得出了表征滞后现象的参数的精确估计值。结果表明,丁丙诺啡和芬太尼抗伤害感受作用的起效和消退主要由生物相分布决定。丁丙诺啡和芬太尼的效应室消除速率常数(k(eo))分别为0.024 min⁻¹[95%置信区间(CI):0.018 - 0.030 min⁻¹]和0.123 min⁻¹(95% CI:0.095 - 0.151 min⁻¹)。另一方面,丁丙诺啡药效学中的部分滞后现象可由受体缓慢结合/解离动力学来解释。解离速率常数(k(off))为0.073 min⁻¹(95% CI:0.042 - 0.104 min⁻¹),结合速率常数(k(on))为0.023 ml/ng/min(95% CI:0.013 - 0.033 ml/ng/min)。芬太尼与OP3受体瞬间结合,因为用动态受体模型未获得合理的k(on)和k(off)值。与文献中早期报道相反,本研究结果表明,丁丙诺啡抗伤害感受作用起效和消退的限速步骤是向脑内的分布。