Suppr超能文献

希美加群与华法林用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者预防卒中的随机试验

Ximelagatran vs warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Albers Gregory W, Diener Hans-Christoph, Frison Lars, Grind Margaretha, Nevinson Mark, Partridge Stephen, Halperin Jonathan L, Horrow Jay, Olsson S Bertil, Petersen Palle, Vahanian Alec

机构信息

Stanford Stroke Center, Palo Alto, Calif, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2005 Feb 9;293(6):690-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.6.690.

Abstract

CONTEXT

In patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, warfarin prevents ischemic stroke, but dose adjustment, coagulation monitoring, and bleeding limit its use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran with warfarin for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial (2000-2001) conducted at 409 North American sites, involving 3922 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and additional stroke risk factors.

INTERVENTIONS

Adjusted-dose warfarin (aiming for an international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0 to 3.0) or fixed-dose oral ximelagatran, 36 mg twice daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was all strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolic events. The primary analysis was based on demonstrating noninferiority within an absolute margin of 2.0% per year according to the intention-to-treat model.

RESULTS

During 6405 patient-years (mean 20 months) of follow-up, 88 patients experienced primary events. The mean (SD) INR with warfarin (2.4 [0.8]) was within target during 68% of the treatment period. The primary event rate with ximelagatran was 1.6% per year and with warfarin was 1.2% per year (absolute difference, 0.45% per year; 95% confidence interval, -0.13% to 1.03% per year; P<.001 for the predefined noninferiority hypothesis). When all-cause mortality was included in addition to stroke and systemic embolic events, the rate difference was 0.10% per year (95% confidence interval, -0.97% to 1.2% per year; P = .86). There was no difference between treatment groups in rates of major bleeding, but total bleeding (major and minor) was lower with ximelagatran (37% vs 47% per year; 95% confidence interval for the difference, -14% to -6.0% per year; P<.001). Serum alanine aminotransferase levels rose to greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal in 6.0% of patients treated with ximelagatran, usually within 6 months and typically declined whether or not treatment continued; however, one case of documented fatal liver disease and one other suggestive case occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The results establish the efficacy of fixed-dose oral ximelagatran without coagulation monitoring compared with well-controlled warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring chronic anticoagulant therapy, but the potential for hepatotoxicity requires further investigation.

摘要

背景

在非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中,华法林可预防缺血性卒中,但剂量调整、凝血监测及出血问题限制了其应用。

目的

比较口服直接凝血酶抑制剂希美加群与华法林预防卒中和全身性栓塞的疗效。

设计、地点和参与者:2000年至2001年在北美409个地点进行的双盲、随机、多中心试验,纳入3922例非瓣膜性心房颤动且有其他卒中危险因素的患者。

干预措施

调整剂量的华法林(目标国际标准化比值[INR]为2.0至3.0)或固定剂量口服希美加群,每日两次,每次36毫克。

主要结局指标

主要终点为所有卒中(缺血性或出血性)及全身性栓塞事件。主要分析基于意向性治疗模型,证明每年绝对差异幅度在2.0%以内时非劣效性。

结果

在6405患者年(平均20个月)的随访期间,88例患者发生主要事件。华法林治疗期间平均(标准差)INR为2.4(0.8),68%的治疗期内处于目标范围内。希美加群的主要事件发生率为每年1.6%,华法林为每年1.2%(绝对差异为每年0.45%;95%置信区间为每年-0.13%至1.03%;对于预先定义的非劣效性假设,P<0.001)。除卒中和全身性栓塞事件外纳入全因死亡率时,率差为每年0.10%(95%置信区间为每年-0.97%至1.2%;P = 0.86)。治疗组间大出血发生率无差异,但希美加群的总出血(大出血和小出血)发生率较低(每年37%对47%;差异的95%置信区间为每年-14%至-6.0%;P<0.001)。接受希美加群治疗的患者中6.0%的血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平升至正常上限的3倍以上,通常在6个月内,无论是否继续治疗通常都会下降;然而,发生了1例有记录的致命肝病病例和1例其他疑似病例。

结论

结果证实了与控制良好的华法林相比,固定剂量口服希美加群在无需凝血监测的情况下,对需要长期抗凝治疗的心房颤动患者预防血栓栓塞的疗效,但肝毒性的可能性需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验