Suppr超能文献

在存在竞争风险的情况下测试治疗效果。

Testing treatment effects in the presence of competing risks.

作者信息

Freidlin Boris, Korn Edward L

机构信息

Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd. EPN 8122, MSC 7434, Bethesda, MD 20892-7434, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2005 Jun 15;24(11):1703-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.2054.

Abstract

Competing risks are often encountered in clinical research. In the presence of multiple failure types, the time to the first failure of any type is typically used as an overall measure of the clinical impact for the patients. On the other hand, use of endpoints based on the type of failure directly related to the treatment mechanism of action allows one to focus on the aspect of the disease targeted by treatment. We review the methodology commonly used for testing failure specific treatment effects. Simulation results demonstrate that the cause-specific log-rank test is robust (in the sense of preserving the nominal level of the test) and has good power properties for testing for differences in the marginal latent failure-time distributions, whereas the use of a popular cumulative incidence based approach may be problematic for this aim.

摘要

竞争风险在临床研究中经常遇到。在存在多种失败类型的情况下,任何类型首次失败的时间通常被用作衡量对患者临床影响的总体指标。另一方面,基于与治疗作用机制直接相关的失败类型使用终点指标,能够使人关注治疗所针对的疾病方面。我们回顾了常用于检验特定失败治疗效果的方法。模拟结果表明,病因特异性对数秩检验是稳健的(在保持检验名义水平的意义上),并且在检验边际潜在失败时间分布的差异方面具有良好的检验效能属性,而使用一种流行的基于累积发病率的方法在这个目的上可能存在问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验